Microsoft Office 2007 What's next for Microsoft's
 

Signs are pointing to Microsoft backing away from IronRuby, the .Net-targeted implementation of the Ruby dynamic programming language that the corporation continues to be developing and funding for that past few of a long time.
For a while, it looked as if Microsoft was shifting full-steam-ahead with dynamic languages. Including the Dynamic Language Runtime towards the Widespread Language Runtime made the Redmondians appear even much more committed. A couple of weeks ago, Microsoft appeared to up the ante again by making IronRuby and IronPython accessible below the Apache two open-source license. Around the same time, Microsoft launched version 1.1 of IronRuby and an alpha of IronPython two.7.
But all isn’t rosy in IronRuby land. According to a now former IronRuby developer, Jimmy Schementi, Microsoft has just one developer left on that project (who is committed to it half-time). Schementi recently quit Microsoft when his manager asked him “what else would you want to work on other than Ruby,” he blogged.
Schementi’s August 6 blog post about his departure from Microsoft has resulted in lots of questions about Microsoft’s intentions around IronRuby, IronPython and dynamic languages in general. Developers are wondering whether to continue with IronRuby projects; whether Silverlight and Azure support are in the cards and additional.
(I’ve asked the Softies a bunch of these questions, as well as about the future of IronPython, but no official word back so much.)
Update (August 10): Microsoft is not commenting around the future of IronRuby. Here’s the official word from Chris Dias, Group Program Manager, Visual Studio:
“At this time, we have no announcements to make about IronRuby and IronPython beyond what we announced in July 2010 — that we were putting these below the Apache License v2.0. Clearly, there is customer and community interest in these languages. With many organizations running mixed IT environments, we continue to value community feedback on how we can support their interoperability needs, and we remain committed to supporting multiple tools and languages that provide developers along with the most choice and flexibility.”
Members of the Ruby community already are talking about the possibility of transitioning IronRuby to non-Microsoft ownership, with members of the community taking charge with the project. For that to happen, however, Microsoft needs to be clear about its intentions,Microsoft Office 2007, as Schementi told members of the IronRuby Core mailing list:
“Though IronRuby is licensed below an open-source license, it is copyright Microsoft. IronRuby.net is owned by Microsoft. The GitHub “ironruby” organization is managed by Microsoft. Etc, etc. If the intention is to cease funding IronRuby, then a non-profit foundation owning IronRuby, like CodePlex Foundation, would be ideal, so that we don’t need to jointly own the copyright.”
Some kind of an official transition is definitely in order, blogged Mono team member Jean-Baptiste Evain:
“The IronRuby team currently consists of one hacker. We don’t know a lot about the IronPython team. And everyone who wanted to work on .net with their favorite dynamic language is freaking out. To a reason. The good news is the code of IronPython, IronRuby and the DLR is open supply, and has recently been re-licensed under the Apache2 license. The official message is that IronRuby’s fate is now in the hands with the community.
“That doesn’t sound like a bright future. So far, the community has long been excluded from the development process of IronRuby. It’s impossible to contribute code to the core compiler of IronRuby, let alone towards the DLR which is now part of .net 4.0. The code in github is a mere mirror of an internal TFS repository, and may or may not be up to date. And until IronRuby’s divorce with Microsoft is completely consumed, it will stay like this. So, sure we can contribute to external libraries, but that’s definitely not where the fun lies, and from now on, nor where the real work will be required.
“So is the solution a fork?”
What’s your read as to what’s going on at Microsoft about the dynamic language front? Is it simply far more Developer Division belt-tightening? Or did IronRuby lose favored status because of perceived competition with ASP.Net MVC? Should/could Microsoft pass the IronRuby torch to another group or the Ruby community at large?

清朝末年人口大概4至5亿，是当初的1/3,鱼的做法集锦，爱吃鱼的要转哦~！。那么，清朝房价是现在的多少呢？
　　最靠谱的比拟，是用一般人的年收入来比，看到底多少年的收入能够买一套房。
七个例子
　　因为清朝人不研讨房价，所以查不到体系的资料，只能找多少个例子，不晓得是否能全面反应出当时的情形： 例一：乾隆十六年(1751年)，天津丁予范在刘家胡同二道街买了一块地，盖了一处四合院，这四合院占地近 一亩，盖了10间房，连买地带盖房，花了180两银子。
　　例二：道光十八年(1838年)，天津任秀坡花200两银子，把丁予范在刘家胡同二道街开发的这套四合 院接了下来，加盖一间客房、一间门楼、三间书房、三间板房，总共投资了350两，最后卖了60 0两。
　　例三：乾隆十二年，北京内城西北角太平湖东(新街口)，七间半85两，相当于现在1275 0元。
　　例四：乾隆十三年，北京内城新帘子胡同(长安街南，新华门与和平门之间)，四间瓦房70两，相当于现在 10500元。
　　例五：康熙五十七年(1718)，北京大兴县北城日南坊(坊名“日南”，相称于某某街道)有一所楼房出 卖，该房临街，下面两间开店，上面两间住人，楼后加盖厢房一间，共计5间房,两肖连中8期http://www.93077.com，卖了210两(参见张传玺《中国历代契约汇编考释》)。
　　例六：乾隆五十八年(1793)，安徽休宁县二十一都二图(“都”相当于乡镇，“图”相当于行政村)也 有一所楼房发售，不临街，但宅基较大，房子共4间，卖了270两(同上)。
　　例七：咸丰七年(1857)，浙山河阴县三十六都三图有人卖房，共计平房3间，卖了60两 (同上)。
　　(备注：下面按每间大约15平方比较)
　　当时米价
为了能与古代可比，按大家常用的粮价来做衡量。
　　在清朝米价的稳定比较大，按最兵荒马乱的清乾隆年间算，粮价大约15文钱/升。一升米据说大于1斤，不到1.25斤，按照最多1.25斤来算，现今超市的米价1.8元/斤，则一升米价格为2.25元/升。1两银合1000文，1000/15×2.25=150元，清乾隆的1两银子相当于现在150元。
　房价与米价比较
　1两=1000文，则新街口的房子(七间半)换算=85000文，新帘子胡同的房子(四间)=70000 文，分辨相当于5667升米跟4667升米。
　　假如每间房子按照25平方米盘算，新街口房子面积187.5平方米，新帘子胡同的屋子面积100平方米 ，则新街口的房价为30.23升米/平方米，新帘子胡同的房价为46.67升米/平方米。
　　一升米据说大于1斤，不到1.25斤，权且依照最多1.25斤来算。超市的米价1.5元/斤，则一升米价钱为1.88元/升。目前，新街口的二手房单价在3万元/平方米。
　　用升米来权衡，今天的房价就是15958升米/平方米。
　　今天的房价粮价比，是清代的528倍！也就是说，今天要想买同样的房子，得用比当年多527倍的食粮去 换。
　　房价与收入比较
　　《大清会典》卷二一“文职官之俸”条：“一品岁支银180两，二品150两，三品130两，四品105 两，五品80两，六品60两，七品45两，八品40两，正九品33两有奇，从九品、不够格31两有奇”。此 为根本工资，称“正俸”；而“京员(中心机关和京城处所官员)例支双俸”，即在基本工资之外加发同样数目标 津贴，称“恩俸”；此外“每正俸银一两兼支米一斛，大学士、六部尚书侍郎加倍支给”，称“俸米”；三者相加 ，就是清朝公务员的工资了。
　　一个七品知县工资45两加45斛米，年收入约合56两银，相当56×150=8400元,香港六合彩网站 2010年很美的118句话。(1斛相当100升)
　　清五品郎中何刚德《春明梦录》云：“余初到京，皆雇车而坐，数年后始以24金买一骡，雇一仆月需六金； 后因公事较忙，添买一跟骡，月亦只费十金罢了。”一只骡子24两×150=3600元，一个仆人月工资6两 ×150=900元，比现今的尺度略低。
　　从以上可以看出，清代的官吏收入是很低的，一个七品知县的工资抵不上一个佣人，所以清代的官员贪污是必 定的，所谓3年清知府，十万雪花银，切实与工资不成比例，所以实际收入高得吓人，相称于年收入 500万元,转载：人品计算器。
　　清代无论官吏还是仆人，在北京市区范畴内买得起一套四间瓦房(草民买差一点的)，相当现在100平方米 的房子，须要多少银子呢？
　　谜底是：普通人一年的收入就够买一套房子了。
　　(现在说的一人多少年收入买一套房，也是取普通人。不要拿一个困窘农夫的收入来算，那样的话，他100 0年的收入也买不起北京新街口一套房)
并且，清朝人买的，基础上仍是连排别墅型，还不公摊面积。