Sharks, Canucks absence apt make adju low nfl jers

RECORD: 9-5-0
GAA: 2.23 | SVP: 0.918 VANCOUVER, B.C. -- The Sharks know there are districts where they need to be better in Game 2 Wednesday (8 p.m. ET, Versus, CBC, RDS). Despite winning Game 1, the Canucks too feel there are alterations that need to be made in their game because faultless has surely no been in their vocabulary over the last two days.

What are the essential adjustments that need to be made going along in these Western Conference Finals? We've got three for each team right here, so peruse on:

SAN JOSE

1. Stop giving the puck away

The Sharks feel their absence of sustained crime spend them dearly in Game 1, but they also feel it was their mistake that they didn't get many going in the Canucks' defensive end in the third period.

Turnovers were a big problem. They were merely credited with three giveaways, but the stat sheet isn't differentiating the fable, at least not according to the Sharks.

"Yeah,cheap nfl jerseys, they weren't necessarily turnovers deep in their end or so many in our end -- I think the independent zone,cheap nba jerseys," Sharks defenseman Dan Boyle said. "We had full control of the puck and we'd find a way to do naught with it, just kind of give up estate, and they were back in our zone."

nhlWid=Math.random()*10000000000000000; document.write('Vancouver deserves some credit for creating the turnovers by standing up at the blue line and not letting the Sharks enter freely, then winning puck battles according the boards. Boyle insists the Sharks will be better with their entries in Game 2.

"We obviously live and dead at the access the along can wheel in the repellent area," he said. "Turnovers were a big ingredient in Game 1."

2. Be stronger

Sharks adviser Todd McLellan said his team accustomed Monday as a day to get mentally stronger and Tuesday's full practice session as a way to get physically stronger going into Game 2. San Jose has to wish it goes because it was both mentally and physically weaker than the Canucks in Game 1,customized nfl jerseys, and that led to the Sharks losing their thighs in the third period.

The Canucks set the physical tone early with some big kicks, such as Chris Higgins' blasting Joe Pavelski off his skates, and they kept forechecking hard and pressuring the puck carriers. They wound up winning puck combats late in the game to preserve the 3-2 victory.

"I meditation they executed better than us and they were sharper mentally than everything else," Sharks defenseman Douglas Murray said. "I suspect you could mention they were the stronger crew because they won extra battles. I don't know whether namely always has to do with who is stronger, but in that game they were."

3. Don't give the refs causative

Of all the areas in which McLellan feels his team needs to be better in Game 2 -- and there are many -- punishment is not 1 of them.

"I didn't think we were really undisciplined," McLellan said. "We weren't fleeing approximately and playing appearance that pragmatic zone that we have set for ourselves. We didn't roam, get frustrated, start whacking, hacking and slashing."

That creature said, the Sharks did give the Canucks three power plays in the first 24 minutes of the game, and then Dany Heatley's elbowing minor in the third period resulted in Henrik Sedin's game-winning power-play goal.

The Sharks have disputed that the Canucks are embellishing to get the calls, and Heatley was livid when he got signaled for getting his elbow up in Raffi Torres' face. He definitely thought Torres was acting to paint the cry, but the truth is Heatley's elbow did get up into Torres' face and that is a penalty.

San Jose has to get rid of those mistakes because more times than not they will prove costly.

VANCOUVER

1. Let Luongo play that puck

Even in victory, Roberto Luongo can't quake that Public Enemy No. 1 name from Canucks' fans cross this province. Luongo gave his critics more reason to obtain on his circumstance when his errant pass wound up right on Joe Thornton's tape and seconds after in the behind of the web late in the first period of Game 1.

Luongo still went on to win the game with 27 saves, but he agreed then that he tensed up when it came time for him to play the puck and that is not what he is assumed to do.

"I didn't want to make dissimilar turnover, but I should just keep playing the puck," Luongo said. "I've done a great job all annual. I don't think it's a disability in my game."

It isn't, which is why he can't think about what went bad when he did play the puck in Game 1. He can't let that affect the way he plays going forward because the Canucks rely on him to go back and play the puck so his defensemen aren't solely responsible and, defiance we say, more vulnerable to turnovers and big hits.

"The minute you start second-guessing, that's when you're working to get into distress," Luongo said. "Obviously the blunders are working to occur. It's human ecology. Everybody's going to make blunders. The major object is how you react to it. You fair got to put it behind you and reserve playing. Nobody's perfect. We're all going to make faults."

2. Make the power play a threat every time

Nobody is saying or expecting the Canucks to score a goal each single time they get a power play, but it isn't absurd to recommend that each time they do get a power play that they should be a menace to score a goal.

Vancouver did wind up with a power-play goal and it did prove to be the game-winner in Game 1, yet the Canucks didn't register a shot alternatively even a scoring accident on two of its premier 3 power plays. The Canucks had three power plays within the 1st 24 minutes of the game and didn't actually intimidate at entire.

They had the League's No. 1 power play in the regular season, so it should be nice ample to at least give them momentum even now it doesn't score.

"I think we have enough options that however the other team is doing, we have one reply because that," defenseman Christian Ehrhoff said when queried about the power play.

3. Carry momentum going forward

OK, so this really isn't an adjustment, but instead more of a expression of what Vancouver has to do early in Game 2.

Momentum doesn't necessarily carry over from one game to the next in the playoffs because, as players say, every game is an thing unto itself. However, the Canucks can money in big time in Game 2 if they all over with a physical presence early and once anew win the puck battles, stand the Sharks up at the blue line and make San Jose's world-class forwards play barricade.

That was the Canucks' recipe for success late in the second period and throughout the third period in Game 1. It will be interesting to see if they can replicate that type of hockey, that type of success early in Game 2 or ambition the Sharks be the ones setting the tone?

"I thought last 25 minutes of (Game 1) we played well, we played quickly," Vigneault said. "I ambition us to do that from the get-go."

Follow Dan Rosen above Twitter at: @drosennhlRelated topics articles:


Marleau in a familiar position - Canucks v Sharks - 2011 Stanley Cup Conference Finals

Stamkos 'We have to play our game' - Bruins v Lightning - 2011 Stanley Cup Conference Finals

Fans, family pay tribute to Boogaard in Minnesota - NHL.com - NHL Insider

Sharks have to be a little bit stronger in Game 2 - Canucks v Sharks - 2011 Stanley Cup Conference Finals