Suicide verdict triggered Lishui QQ
different point of view
domestic network rights legislation generally lighter weight control
network legislation Times reporter Lee flute
Lishui QQ group similar to yesterday's suicide verdict, in the academic community and led to heated discussions on the network.
because it involves
With the rapid expansion in recent years the number of Internet users, whether it is the first time last year, the Legislative wading in Hangzhou The decision, legislation has emerged as China's Internet
human way of life that has become a virtual world, is experiencing the pains of reshaping the rules.
Tencent responsibility and the freedom of penguins
China University of Political Science Professor Hong Daode that, Tencent people not qualified to review the content of communications, Web sites can not be held responsible for suicide.
similar for the Lishui QQ suicide decision, the legal profession showing a different view.
China University of Political Science Professor Hong Daode that, Tencent people not qualified to review the content of communications, Web sites can not be held responsible for suicide.
the content of the discussion? I think not. QQ group representing people in the discussion of correspondence (if Tencent QQ group discussion review),
coach purse, is equal to the post office purposefully opened private letters, the equivalent of infringing privacy.
specialized research networks Huazhong University School of Law Dr. Rao Chuanping that, as a network service provider, for the dissemination of information on hazards or violations, which generally bears the legal obligation of reasonable care.
the so-called reasonable care refers to the network service provider shall obvious infringement may result in hazardous or information security review responsibility, the obligation to promptly deleted. Direct provision of services for the specific content of the major portals, the reasonable care, promptly remove the relevant hazards, the liability of infringement of information is obvious. However, only the information transfer from the .
Raochuan Ping told reporters, in fact, national laws generally do not require the network only as a transmission channel for dissemination of technical service providers the obligation to take active review. The same is true of the law.
largest law firm, Zhejiang Ze, deputy Renluo Yun believes that, QQ group is an open group, anyone can add, does not involve the users privacy, of course, private chat, you can not interfere too much, To be treated with caution.
Rowan said that for the forum such as
network legislation anxious
Dr. Rao Chuanping, legislation in the network, we further legislative intervention in the first technical autonomy and the right to adequate protection of the main network.
the main reason.
session. Lishui is based on the decision of this method.
addition, there are some, such as Network Security Protection Management Regulations
recent years, due to the network frequency of cases, legislation on the attitude of the network, but also the different views,
first is eager to legislative point of view. Such view is that China has 300 million Internet users who have a
second,
coach sunglasses, timely follow-up. The timing of proposed legislation to timely follow-up, pay attention to the specific legislation on the accuracy, relevance, and overall coordination with the international standards and so on.
third category, the suspension of the legislative point of view. This view, the history of the network is so short, that legislators may still groping in the front row. As other areas of human society, before the statute has been among the people there is a certain rule. Therefore, maintaining network security and protection of Internet freedom, in addition to the law, the use of the existing network with its own characteristics, and by social forces and the mainstream values of the public opinion, so that the website self-regulation, compared with the rush to legislation, often more effective .
Dr. Rao Chuanping reminded that legislation is necessary to grasp a network of
Dr. Rao Chuanping, legislation in the network, we must implement the network of self-respect in order to achieve autonomy; even if the country out of its maintenance duties for the public interest will require legislation, you need to carefully and must take full account of the state, society, balancing the various interests of citizens, not just attention to one of Hu Shi other.
Raochuan Ping said that at present many of the central and local network of legislation and case law, there are some commonalities, such as lack of proof anxious, over-strengthen the government's control of the network, while ignoring the rights related to the main network protection.
the right to re-tube light of legislation dilemma
the legislation provides for the obligation of not only rare, but generally limit judicial power, especially the right to limit judicial review of acts of government control.
The People's Court in Lishui City, Tencent Liandu's decision is based on
under which
the Internet including websites, web pages, forums and other public platforms, including QQ, MSN and other private technology platform, however, the Ordinance does not clearly define the scope of control and Internet companies to Moreover, due to involve
In addition, legislation in the network, there are many lower rank Legislation and regulations contrary to the principles of the phenomenon of the upper.
, for example, legal and legitimate rights and interests of other organizations. But in the subsequent rules and regulations promulgated by the various universal only emphasized the normative order, maintain security,
coach purses outlet, while ignoring the rights of the networks of the main protection.
Moreover, only very few of these legislative provisions in the Government's obligations and liabilities, and more generally limit judicial power, especially the right to limit judicial review of acts of government control. Thus, when individuals, corporations and other organizations by the government against improper administrative action, the corresponding opportunities for access to justice to obtain relief have been denied.
Rao Chuanping also believe that the network's other big problem is that the Legislative Council of the main and more low level, the lack of authoritative, systematic and coordinated. In addition,
coach outlet online,
contrast, the virtues and other European countries is not only a comprehensive communications network behavior standardized class legislation, or even
In addition, the lack of democratic participation in the legislative process in China, but also legislation in the current network problems. The network of a large number of specific legislation has largely not been scientific evidence published to be signed, but not listen to the relevant agencies, organizations, citizens.
network of our country are mostly sector specific legislation legislative bodies, the main basis for such legislative procedure established by the State Council,
coach shoes, given legislative process is clearly incompatible with the phenomenon of the executive and legislative power control in the spirit of modern administrative law, which triggered a series of drawbacks, easy to make the executive manufacturing improper procedures malicious prejudice the interests of the Chief Administrative Law relative to achieve timely and effective manner.
because the network is not perfect legislation, and local authorities a general lack of legislative protection of the rights of the main network, a direct result of judicial practice in recent years a large number of cases of civil rights violations. If this year's April 16, Fuzhou users forward for help people, Previous
1
2 Next
新建 文本文档 (7)
Hybrid Mode
