right definition must include the qualifications, requirements, powers, interests,
free the five elements. Moral rights constitute the basic provisions of personality, is one reason why the most basic human rights. Moral rights and moral obligations are inseparable, the two do not correspond to mean human
life the ideal state of damage. Moral obligation of non-rights-motivated, not to illustrate the moral right and moral interests of outside motivation, also shows high moral values and moral obligations and not the separation of moral rights, not to treat the non-moral action.
The definition of Right must include with five factors asfollows: ENTITLEMENT, CLAIM, INTERIST, POWER, LIBERTY, Themoral right is the most radical right which means why humanto be human, so it constitutes the radical priscriptive ofpersonality, The moral right identities with the moral duty,
true religion outlet, the non-corresponding between them means the violation to the ideal state of human life. The non-rihgt motivility of moral duty not only illustrates that morality does not hold the interests as motives except the moral right, but also illustrates that the of lofty the moral value does not effect by the devorce of the moral duty and the moral right, either the non-moral treatment.
moral obligation and moral rights is an important theoretical value and practical significance The
Ethics issues. Academic research on this issue should be said that a lot of ideas flourish scene, but there are many issues yet to clarify, some of the basic meaning of the concept and its use is quite confusing, for in-depth discussions of moral obligation and moral rights is still very necessary.
First, rights and moral rights
in ancient Greek and ancient Latin, there is no equivalent to the modern concept of the right word.
As a social concept of the rights consciousness , is the 17th century and early 18th century after the thing. As the 17th century and early 18th century bourgeois revolution, the concept of rights has been widely used. Since then,
herve leger sale, the concept of rights has been widely used. In 1948, the United Nations General Assembly adopted the first
International of human rights documents
right word with a wide range of philosophical meaning. In the modern
Chinese , the right to direct decomposition of the However, both the power or the interests of both the concept alone can not articulate the full meaning of the right. In a general sense, rights are often understood as not to interfere qualifications. This understanding hit the right elements of the concept, but not the notion of rights is contained in the full meaning, at least not as a philosophical category of the concept will provide a right of all meaning. Since the right is a qualification with an interest and have the power to achieve this qualification, it must show as a requirement to achieve their own interests, and this claim is morally inalienable. Only as required, until the rights of the content of specific interest.
From this, as a philosophical concept, right areas not only from one side to grasp, but from different angles to take. The right to at least include the following five elements: eligibility, requirements, interests, power, freedom. On the right to inspect, you can order any of the five elements of the origin, the other elements of content, a comprehensive grasp. Elements in terms of qualifications, rights that have, have, implement, complete, require some qualification or a benefit. Qualification is a core element of the concept of rights, rights of substance, the gist is eligible to enjoy the right means with qualifications. Eligible for performance rights as people in the community
relations has the connotation of a personality requirements. Requires these elements, the right to enjoy that status because of the social relations and obligations of the parties have a claim. Requirement is the right characteristics, because it gives the right to special meaning, so that the rights and general interests be distinguished. Elements in terms of interests, rights that should be enjoyed in the social relations of interest. Rights is essentially a social relations, interests constitute the essence of the right. Areas of interest element is the right basis. Rights as interests, and its essence is a non-competitive sense of superiority, that is a way for their own benefit without damage so that the interests of any other person. Have the right means the right conferred by the owner because of eligibility requirements or some sort of expected benefits. The concept of power, the exercise of the rights that the main benefit of a force, ability, strengths. Meaning both the power of the notion of rights as the moral force of the performance, but also the performance of real
economy ,
politics ,
legal power. The former is fundamental, invisible, which is concrete,
MBTシューズ 販売店, visible. Both support each other. The freedom of these elements, the right to enjoy and that have qualified for the inviolability of or do not interfere with nature. Freedom is the essence of property rights, violation of rights or interference means that the negation of social relations. In the moral violations and can not interfere with the rights. The five elements are interwoven, and each definition of the rights are indispensable. Can any one of origin, other elements of comprehensive grasp of the notion of rights. If eligible for the origin, the rights can be defined as: in social relations, the main result of legal, moral,
herve leger skirts,
traditional the inviolability of giving and have inalienable, can not interfere with the enjoyment of the implementation, claim an interest in the sum required qualifications or higher status.
moral rights and rights of what is the relationship? Moral right to exist? The existence of the concept of moral rights of this negative attitude and gone, for example, Bentham described the concept of moral rights as standing However, the recognition of the validity of the concept of moral rights were still in the majority. In my opinion, the moral right not only exist, but also the most general, basic human rights. The concept of moral rights of human social life, but this basic truth. The concept of a rights and obligations to be in the form of interest between man and man's relationship in the composition of the composition of human social life
system be fixed. Obligation to express interest in the side, the right to take that interest in the side. With the obligations and rights of the human interests is specific, both comfortable and is for-that should be included, when the ideals of the dynamic relationship. So, with the rights and obligations, which means the individual in social relations occupy a certain position, with a particular higher status, with the reason why the human personality as a human being. All moral rights and moral obligations reflects the personality of the moral requirements of necessity and absolute. We can say that the rights and obligations constitute the primary elements of moral character, moral rights and moral obligations, as is as a man lies. From this, the moral right of the fundamental, universal rights is the most general concept of the right content. This is the basic meaning from the notion of rights can be seen. The same rights and obligations of the word, the basic meaning is should be, when. Rights and legitimate in most Western text is the same word, meaning evolved from legitimate rights. Chinese The We can say that the concept of moral rights constitute the right or the content of the most common elements. In fact, the moral and legal obligations as the main modus operandi is the same as on the distinction between moral and legal rights is the main distinction between the way required. In the form of behavior, even though both may have their own unique form, but most can overlap. Therefore, the moral and legal rights often show consistency. From objectivity is concerned, both are human and social development to a certain stage of the product is in the interests of the social division of labor relations on the basis of differences in results; from subjective terms, both are recognized by the rules or protection [/u] of the required range of self-consciousness. Therefore, the implementation of moral rights from the way that a certain moral system is recognized by a special mode of regulation to maintain the moral right of way from the requirements is the right to ask for the corresponding obligations.
Second, the moral obligation and the relationship between moral rights and obligations
rights always has some degree of contact. English word derived from Latin DUTY DUE, meaning that the debt should be also. Debt should also,
mulberry outlet, the rights of creditors have their claims, debtors have to repay the debt obligations. Therefore, DUE also contains the right meaning. DUTY RIGHT turn corresponds with the right. Although run by recourse obligations derived rights, or rights of recourse and the corresponding obligations, is not an easy task, but in the debt relationship, rights and obligations of the correlation is always seen as deserved. Therefore, the rights and obligations as the same relationship between the subject and the subject of the two opposing requirements, the nature of the corresponding contact.
Moral rights and moral obligations of the new theory
moral rights and moral obligations of the new leaves on the
Ye Peng Peng Guangzhou
scientific community hospital philosophy [/u]
Cultural Studies the
More articles related to topics：
Copper market will remain weak in 2009 dropping _
######## oakley sunglasses ofa xaz zkva dbs
herve leger skirts jgn ksl wsdm elf
Hybrid Mode
