Windows 7 Enterprise WebKit Team Admits Error, Dow

[lettsen04517]

Do you build gorgeous sites? Have you been a net developer who crafts spectacular HTML5CSSJS? If so,Office 2010 Standard, you might want to look at HiFi. It truly is a brand new website publishing platform that offers you 100% manage around your HTML mark-up. I served formulate it. Verify it out and tell me what you suppose. "WebKit's Accept header results in internet developers choosing between HTTP incorrectness or a bad user experience. Follow the HTTP spec and your users will get XML dumps as demo'd,Office Pro Plus 2010, or do not follow the HTTP spec and roll your own one-off content-negotiation protocol."It is hard to talk about this issue in 140 characters, so here are my thoughts...The naive use of Accept is non-RESTful because it renders external provenance data useless or wrong. For example, suppose there is a resource,Windows 7 Enterprise, that has a XML representation and a HTML representation. Furthermore, assume the XML representation was authored by Jon and the HTML representation was authored by Jake. Now, suppose I tweet something like the following:"verify out Jon's work @ If you dereference the above URI in Firefox you'll actually be looking at Jake's work. This means I need to send a second piece of state information (almost like a cookie) along with my tweet, like so:"examine out Jon's work @ but first set your browser to applicationxml"Clearly, this is a step backward compared with something like:"verify out Jon's work @ In fact, the trouble with WebKit's Accept header is not that it is wrong, just that it is unexpected. That is,Office Enterprise 2007 Key, WebKit's behavior is dependent upon a piece of shared state embedded across all WebKit clients and, furthermore,Windows 7 Enterprise Key, that shared state is different than the shared state embedded across all Firefox clients. None of this sounds RESTful to me.