The company was acquainted with fraud to the Housi

[mill90771]

Information Times (reporter Yan Xiaoguang) the court in forging the million square meters of land in an attempt to defraud 65 million yuan. Ultimately, the crook arrested after 1.9 million in fraudulently obtained, but deceived the investment company, has been fooled to the Guangzhou City Land and Housing Authority (Housing Authority) and the Bureau of Finance to pay the 14.72 million yuan of the
cheap ######## escrow a subsidiary of the land Result has been to do no less than this piece of land certificate to become an
tone YT Chen Yaoxiong asked to be a piece of 65 million attempt to defraud, deceive the final two in Guangzhou Hongxin Investment Co., Ltd. hook.
acquainted with a huge transfer fee refund do not return

Nugao two chambers has paid 42 million yuan to the Financial Bureau and the Housing Authority of tax 1429 million yuan of land transfer payments, then cheat arrested.
the Housing Authority and the Finance Bureau have refused to refund acquainted with the huge transfer fees. Helpless, the macro new company to Guangzhou City Intermediate People's Court of First Instance ruling that, while In fact the two companies heavily in debt, simply could not really afford. To do this,
days ago, High Court hearing on the case, the Housing Authority and the Finance Bureau were sent to appear in court.
parties say

Housing Authority: land transfer, a refund can be considered the first-instance court found fraud macro errors by paying the new company, but money is needed because the final approval of the Financial Bureau, the Housing Authority can not be separately refund, so the account directly from the land sector the refund is not possible. company name, capital inflow of funds belonging to the state treasury,tods shoes sale, if the land acquisition corresponding taxes, transfer payments back to the unrelated third party, will result in loss of state assets. the first instance verdict Land Bureau and Finance Bureau was inappropriate in this case relations are not the beneficiaries of interest, we carried out in accordance with the implementation of the trial court's decision. Agents claimed the first instance court found that although the south and overseas headquarters company unjust enrichment, but in reality, beneficiaries should be the City Housing Authority and the Municipal Finance Bureau, as the company south and overseas headquarters or less on the financial books to pay this tax, they are totally unaware of the matter.
wrong delivery, and the Housing Authority and the Finance Bureau also has no objection, then the refund, government agencies should have the responsibility of active error correction can not be further delayed.