The judge said bars should be qualified to purchas

Morning News Internet cafe operators, said: expensive claims after they were broadcast, not reluctant to lose, just feel injustice. the money is certainly not happy; but our right to enjoy the play, you really are infringed. April 21, Hefei High Court order to solve the problem of Internet cafes often the respondent, deliberately held the At the forum, the judge gives the advice:
movies infringement case against most Internet cafes

the unauthorized broadcast in the cafes, (hereinafter referred to as Ultimately, the court held that bars tort compensation 24,000 yuan. Internet cafes this strategy against first-instance ruling, recently presented to the Hefei Intermediate People's Court of Appeal.

owners of Internet cafes also know ye not unjust infringement

knowing infringement penalty, Internet cafe operators also often knowingly do what? At the forum, judges, bar owners, copyright issues discussed on this side.
Mr. Wei said that now most of the cafe owners have purchased a video platform, are also willing to pay a fee, but the platform does not include all the movies the film copyright, Internet cafes, or would be subjected to some of the rights of people prosecuted. Malicious rights? is infringed. film, so that a great risk of infringement, Internet cafes do not want to infringement subjective. the operator is confused.
Internet cafe operators for fear that the Court of Intellectual Property Tribunal high horse arrows made some of his proposals.
Ma Arrow,lunettes de soleil discount, said in November 2010, the Supreme Court issued a provider of qualified film and television business lawfully obtained, does not bear the civil liability for damages.
pre-trial mechanism, which would reduce or even eliminate illegal to buy some of the video platform.