Wife appealed to millions of family wealth and the

alleged,polo ralph lauren big pony, according to Ms. Zhang, 14 August 1995, she and her husband gave birth to a daughter of Mr. Liu, the daughter of congenital mental retardation, physical disabilities, require long-term treatment and others care.
and Wang and Mr. Liu was formerly the co-workers, from April 2002 to October 2010 period, the two have maintained lovers. In the meantime, Mr. Xiang Liu Wang repeatedly demanded large sums of money to buy real estate, cars and luxury consumption.
very fact that due to busy to take care of their children and work, until this year, Wang and her husband Mr. Liu found between the bad behavior.
2010 年 11 1st, Wang and Mr. Liu broke up, and signed a split agreement.
very fact that the matrimonial property protected by law, Wang's bad behavior has seriously affected her family life, violated her right to legal title to property and the spouse, cause huge economic loss and mental harm, should bear the corresponding liability.
very fact that the return of property of 1.06 million requested Wang, and compensation for mental damages 5,000.
The case is under further investigation.
experts say

if the introduction of new judicial interpretation of the said that the judicial practice in the past, similar very fact that the return of property to a third party made the case not uncommon, but the law has not been clearly defined, has reached the dispose of jointly owned property on the grounds to the courts, advocates agreement null and void.
the
not pay compensation for third party can not sue to the court for support, and has paid the compensation for the husband can not sue to demand the return, but her husband without the wife can dispose of common property of the family sued a third party to demand the return of property.
Yu Jing lawyers that the new judicial interpretation of this provision increased the spouse, the protection of property rights, if promulgated, will have to constraints.
regulations link

in the legislation, currently under public consultation on the people living together, cohabitation agreement for the lifting of the compensation of property, a party required to pay the compensation or payment of compensation claims after the return of estoppel, the court shall not be supported.
However, legal marriage in violation of the parties sued the couple claim the return of the common property, the court shall accept and deal with specific circumstances.