Reproduced the game of puzzle and mysterious mean

A dictate of money treatment exercising, the red and black is often the highlight of the game. The company also introduced a kind of exercise different editions, different focusing of the game, partake players working through a very laborious game, the often fruitful, even saying Hu Empowerment consciousness. Common experience is: a win-win cooperation, and bounty, tolerance and so on. But if understanding this stop, the value of the game, in fact, most are a garbage.
game told us, fair cooperation and win-win position? Revealed in the game, only the depths of human selfishness, narrow-minded, uncooperative, wrong faith, feisty, cats and dogs, duplicity? Not only namely.
Let's look at the entire process of the game (due to the design of the contents of the different companies, where the criterion version, for instance):
staff organization:
group of people will be divided into A, B groups, two groups granted among the commutes, after internal debates, the cards to each other after the vote, the cards can only be red and black. To keep divide a correspondent for the other side among the two groups announced the cards, correspondent must confirm the A or B group of the cards after the results legal, in mandate to release the other group the cards.
rules of the game:
1, each of the parties choose their own leader, head of the organization by the vote, the statistics of how many red cards, the digit of black cards, to the way the bulk correspondent reports the results of the voting group;
2, the group, by the time 1 abstained, the vote is invalid, the validity of voting by the journalist to deny alternatively validation;
3, scoring rules are as follows:
If either sides of the black card, every have 3
If there is one for the red card, the other for the black card, black card is the negative side was 5 points, a red square is 5
If you obtain both a red card, of a negate 3 points
4, the game must be five votes, the second round score × 2, the fourth round score × 3, the final outcome of the rule is: the highest win total is divided. (Some training courses company, also has two group negotiation chain, let the two groups to communicate, of course, negotiations often can not keep its agree.)
Course of the game:
host announced after the start of the game, team no communication between, but within the group can fully communicate in the meantime, the host will not reply any questions raised by participants in the game. Two groups were separated in two conference rooms, everyone whack, there are few people volunteered to require that when the head immediately, and then published their election manifesto, and finally, self-confidence is often very strong, fluent, good people elected.
then began to vote, which is more chaotic process. Few of the rules of the game foggy, or even no interest; some immediate annotate, was asked selected red cards, it was suggested that selected black cards, at loggerheads. But in the end the voice is usually red dominated, because their outlook is: both we suffer, or we win big! While others have elected black big risk: If the other side of the black, we have the opportunity to score, if the other celebration choose red, his big loss! More people are two-sided bring, if selected also red line, also choose the black line. The crowd began to have arguments, a different point of view want to convince each other, and some people playing a siesta, Landelikuai it all. Like a agreeable blues!
then began a show of hands vote, voting statistics, the result is all wrong, no verification of the native group members first, second, it was cited double or hand,Puma Trionfo LO L II, or do not raise their hands. Confusion, some people began to call for replacement of head, it was considered undemocratic, and threatened to abstain from the process, especially the dominant voice. Several times after the waiver, we believe that abstention is a waste of time, so unanimous: Do not waiver! Later, people who plan to abstain feel guilty, nor comes again shouted the. Because games ordinarily begin at night, this time too often yet midnight.
soon, to a correspondent, reporting requirements, pate of the election results. This time, pate on things that do not clear, talk haltingly, drawing boos. Correspondent said: I declare invalid the results of your group to vote! Correspondent left, the mob quickly opened downtown, there is reflection on the problem, there are requirements because head, as well as investigation rules of the game, chaotic muddle.
If the head of the clear-headed, noisy enough, but also to nourish the situation, or he can take the initiative to Yin had. If the case for head, confusion will be repeated until there is a strong enough team leader there.
choose red voice gradually rising. Many-sided wag faction, began to tend to choose red. Choose black in upholding, but their voices more and more. Group results out: choose red! Finally acknowledged the vote to correspondent, when the results of the first round out of: A group of selected red, B group selected red. The two sides of a negative 3 points.
One amusing outcome is that if any group of men long, the first round of culling is the result of about one hundred percentage red, and women headed, but occasionally may be elected black cards. Of course, if the correspondent hurl a few more women selected head of the mini chance.
after several rounds of voting process is relatively smooth, the results can be quickly out. I have experienced three times in the game, the result appears It’s about time:
the first round of the second circular (× 2) third circular of the fourth round (× 3) the fifth round of
A Group B Group A Group B Group Group A Group B Group A Group B Group A Group B
red red red red the first black
red red red red second third black
red, black and red, black and red and black black black
their last score is:
first: A group of -2, B -22
second group: A group -10, B group - 20
third: A group of +32, B group -26
which should be famous that the third field of the Group B leader is a very strong matron, she was opinionated to convince you prefer black card, of course, team members because of her tight paid the price to make 50 push-ups, and she made a 100.
I believe the game has gone through these three people who will not have the same feelings. For the first game, the fact in the third round of voting, the situation is very favorable, I suggest that we should hurl the black card, so fool the enemy, even if the other side of the red, we were fewer losses (because the second round of score to × 2, meantime the fourth round score to × 3), so in the third round, we must a red card, the other party has been misled, this one is most presumable a black card, which is a score, with the effect of the final word!
In the second game,Puma Future Cat Low, both team leader of the change is almost a farce, and finally, by the teachers ruthless rebuke: to discern how much your total score! How much are you wasting resources, and eventually it is a lose-lose!
thespian third game, it seems that in the fourth round of Group B last touched the A group, they also began a black card, of course, this is the mighty stance, because they have the odds in hand.
a lot of people do this game through the night, done a lot of people burst into tears after the game, what divine games, there is such a traumatic effect? This is just a game it, need it?
life is not a game? But the most important game of life difference is that we only chance - of life for each of us have only one chance. Game play is not good, we can begin over, we can even change the rules of the game, to get the results in our favor, but our life? We have no ability to change any rules, even approximate the end of the game we will have occasion to know the rules of the game and meaning, this is how melancholy and frustrating fact!
Let us recollection, the game gives us the reflection and inspiration:
a team of team leaders and human
co-optation voting process, it is a human focus on the process unfolds. We can see that some people play, some people silent, some people confused. For any leader to waken
When correspondent negative group after the vote, often immediate stir within the group, then group leader if strong ample, he will lose the position, but if the team with too strong, he also led the team into the errors, the third game results illustrate this point.
experienced after the initial disordered state, there are three basic human face clearly, let us close and see at their eyes, their interior world.
the first person to insist on a red card, they represent the depths of human nature aggressive, attack, selfish and self-oriented. Their slogan is: either win the whole world, or entirely lost, or with the antagonist dead! This is very typical gambler intellect. Or, this is the behavior of the wolf.
second, they are gentle and lenient, they wish to expand the mart attach with antagonists to achieve a win-win. They are rational, but more idealism: what they think their tolerance, harmony, and kindness, we will be able to get the same feedback to each other,Puma Shoes, how they know it must be able to win? Their ideal is conditional, they need to live in appropriate context. Or, this is the action of sheep.
third person, who is blind, disturbed, and they lack the wisdom to distinguish right from wrong, they do not even know what they should be out of cards, they are susceptible to induction, we can say that their mind is basically immature , or, is irresponsible, so they either go with the stream, or no position, or just give up.
Then, in the course of the game, there is causative that is pragmatic, full of wisdom, that know how aggressive they know tolerance, indulgence, also know people who give a timely form? No. Because this is the trap game design, game designers just want to through this game, focus on human exposure to the secluded, dingy matter, once and for all, everyone is not absolute, has its own blind spots and errors, unfortunately, their do not know.
therefore, focus above exposing person weakness, it is the subtleties of game design.
Second, cooperation and communication,Puma Speed Cat Big, combative and give up, we are strong and the feeble
when to onset, but when the tolerance? Some people in the beginning of the game, like a number of ways to communicate with other members of the group, and finally to approach a win-win situation, but in the end can not do so because: First, the group can not communicate between; the second is the original agreement, it is effortless destruction and change. In the opening of voting, it was suggested that we should take the initiative to faith! Attracted everyone's to blame, honesty has a price! Indeed, a group once the injury soon after appropriate aggressive. This is not a microcosm of life, do we? Business once cheated, now no longer believe that anyone, including my own parents; be a fool a man dressing cups, wearing glasses after the look, feel all of them are horrifying. Besides, we live in a world of asymmetric information, we want to communicate, but how much we really spent a mind to communicate? Once the poor communication, we will not give up easily, and we began to think the problem are rooted in each other, because the other side is so unreasonable, unreasonable and ruthless.
It is said that the strong can give the other a black card, because he has the hazard tolerance, so weak it? The weak can only await for the opportunity (when the other side of the black card),Puma Future Cat GT, or only a lose-lose? Another subtlety of the game design is to design a
in the game, people easily give up the In the team, sometimes we will not give up easily, because we must think the collective interest. But we look at the sequel of the game rules: winning absolute is the maximum points. In fact, if we adhere to abstain, at least we can be So it was that out, but also a kind of wisdom, as the Thirty-Six in the
really strong, we must have strong comprehension that They can lower the figure, they are humble and moderate, their So strong, they are erroneous?
real world dominated by the strong, will give the weak mechanism set out, and will defend such a mechanism. But the real weak, can not seize this opportunity? Know how to leave, often no longer the weak; and exit of people do not understand, is the real need of protection, but they often do not understand, who can help got them?
Third, change and change, sagacity and responsibility, commitment and faith
I inquired the male to guide the team to vanquish the team leader, is what forces you to the end? Why do you want spared no effort to convince you choose the black card,Puma First Round, even after we vote, you are able to resist the Her faint smile: a responsibility.
is the responsibility! What a supremely dull and word language!
reflect on our team, how many times the gallantry to withstand pressure, stick to their principles, firmly to the goal and not change the target. Because we are too easy to allow yourself to become flexible, we reasoned that the world is changing, the only constant is change itself, so our goal can be modified to change the instruction, strategies can be rebuilt. Our cause is that people in the battlefield, involuntarily ah.
some time, we insist, hear to any against and critique, we believe that this is right, we are absolutely insistent to do it, the end result, perhaps we succeed, possibly failure, how do we to reflect on it? Is it just to say to yourself: this is God, this is some kind of preparation, one-third of the workers, seven destiny?
If so, do not we mention these words, because everybody knows the utter truth, speak out, and have actually become rubbish. So, what is our guiding principle and not?
first responsibility. As a group leader, we have to give up everything for this group. A mother, babies in trouble when in the often incredible explode of strength, will rescue their children, we are celebrating this large motherhood at the same time, think, this power get busy? Is it not responsibility?
In real life, how much to disburse for the team leader, comparable to the mother of the children to pay it? State-owned undertakings is clearly impossible, because the leading is nominated by higher authorities, diverse the mother of to children, fertile woman has experienced grief, experienced the anguish of childbirth once, diverse in the mother's children, as blood interlinked, Heart matched. Some of the leading mobile call 24 hours a day, and some people think that this is a fastening, only a few people understand, this is responsibility.
emulated by wisdom, is based on the wisdom of responsibility, or is based on the wisdom of the responsibility. At first, we may not be clever, but the responsibility can help us do that; first, we are not strong enough, but also a responsibility to help us do this. Wise direction of the responsibility to lest mistakes we made. Who in each other even after the two red cards adhere to the third round of cards is also a black head, her sense of responsibility commendable, but her wisdom gone? After the cards in the first round, the results of their drawback, then they should reflect on strategy, and if the sheep's kindness to accommodate the wolf attacks the sheep really lost everything, but the wolf will be everything. I asked her, why do not you choose to abstain? She was speechless.
If we are compliant to mash for the team, then we should leftover no exertion to become a team leader or team melodrama an essential role, because it was their responsibility to do. Of course, our situation in the team, on the one hand depends on our sense of responsibility, and partly depends on our ability. However, if we become a team leader, does not average we must make an repellent or defensive strategy, we can also choose to give up, you can also give up the disregard, which is our right, ah, why should we give up accessible this right?
then think of Zhuge Liang's 6 Ky Son. In the orthodox literati's mind, six Ky Son represents a obligation, The face of ordinary and incompetent boss, if he truly responsible for the mutual folk the globe, why did he not replaced? The face of knowing that they are impossible to recover the Central Plains of the combat, why he should insist on coming out, until killed in battle? This may not have the wisdom and responsibility, but a question of faith. Faith can not be reproached. Team leader for the faith, he will still make errors, they would be dying, but we can not respect.
four, the game and Nash equilibrium, the ultimate truth of the universe
fact, red and black game from Tucker (Tucker) 1950, proposed a model of the famous game, This is a complete information static game of a typical circumstance. (So-called complete message game is the game the additional parties are entirely aware of the game side in entire cases the loss or gain, but likewise know what they are in all cases of loss or gain.)
Basic assumptions Prisoner's Dilemma as with: The police seized 2 partners criminals, but the lack of ample evidence opposition their crimes. As long for there is a admitted murderer, will be able to confirm the charges. To get the confession, the police these two criminals were detained to discourage them fashion a conspiracy of pacify. If they both alleged no guilty, then they will be sentenced to lesser charges of one year in prison; if they have one person confessed to their crimes, the honest, instant loosen, without the guilty appeals will be sentenced to 8 years; if they both confessed to their offenses, they will be sentenced to five years in prison each. They tin not collude in
and fully rational, beneath the prelude that everyone must pursue their own interests and not care to aggrandize the interests of his accomplices, and the other two sides will not believe the spirit of cooperation, the final result, not only attain their lusted results (each sentenced to five years) that they could not escape the The ending is also known as
This treatise does not in-depth discussion of game theory and Nash balance, because too numerous elements that decide the results of a game: both sides know the information is complete (one half of the game a lot of people, it is unclear rules); can communicate (one for each group members will detect ways to try to ascertain each other's information); the approval are being complied with (if anyone violated an concert, he is the best interests of earnings earners); both sides are rational (think almost who insist on a black card group long bar), and so on. In many games, I was wondered to detect that the real
Why? This is a cage game, or the life of the cage?
the basic laws of thermodynamics tells us: We can nor create nor devastate energy. The energy of the universe is a nailed amount of the beginning and not changed, although energy can nor be created nor be destroyed, but it can be converted from one form to variant form, this is the first decree of thermodynamics. That being the case, we are not in anybody way the consumption of normal energy? Second statute of thermodynamics, when energy is became from one state to dissimilar state, we will The penalty is that we lost in the hereafter to do some variety of power for a decisive energy. This is phoned entropy. Entropy is a element of energy, but it can no longer be transformed into deeding, that is, it has no use. In other words, the world we live day by daytime look no another, even extra beautiful, but it is inevitable one daytime toward the dead. When the silence to one end, re-big bang universe, all overagain. This is similar to Buddhism, said: into, to live, bad ventilation, and this is the truth of the universe. Contemporary science and archaic wisdom, was really surprisingly similar!
once achieved the final truth of the universe, 1:01 to lose and obtain, what namely the point?
need to explain things, basically there will be no champions in red and black game. No one in this game will feel a real win, everyone in the reflection, for his life blind spots and errors, as the depths of human desire for the human form of society.
Finally, think of Mr. Li met with the mainland in April this year when visiting entrepreneurs, to the 4 questions, then learn time, as the article's end:
1, when we dream of greater success, We have no more hard to prepare?
2, when our dreams become a chairman, we have by the service of humility?
3, we often only absence to change others, we know when to change yourself?
4, each day when we reprove others, we know how to do self-reflection?

original author: Ren Zhengping
-------------------- ----------------------
This article is rebuilt from: the wind in the valley: the game of secret and profound definition red and black
perusing space with QQ Email Subscribe valley of the wind
what is the reading room?