Intermediary reselling counterfeit verdict by the

(Reporter Liu Jie) 3 real estate agent staff forged a court decree, the customer purchases under 5 years of housing sold, seek to obtain a commission. Yesterday morning, Changping District Court of First Instance to the crime of forged official documents and sentenced them to imprisonment for 6 months to 1 year.
forged a successful transfer of Judgement

Guo in the Changping District, East Town, a district has a long Jinyuan affordable housing, purchase of less than 5 years, looking for resale. However,gucci, affordable housing management methods, to purchase the fitness room less than 5 years and can not be traded, apply for transfer. Beijing home to find her real estate brokerage forward Ltd Regional Manager Zhou help. Beijing Jing Zhou to find Home Real Estate Co Director of Operations and the Beijing Jing Lan a Real Estate Co deputy manager of a particular home to find solutions. Three to discuss the idea of ​​a forged court verdict - said Guo is not the money owed on a particular, to find someone forged a verdict, ruling that it will transfer to a particular offset housing loans.
hand forged verdict, they went to housing authorities for the smooth transfer procedures. After the house sold, a commission of 8500 yuan Zhou, Lan a 12,500 yuan a commission.
crime more than once

November 23 last year, a particular incident. Zhou, Lan surrendered a day to the public security organs. Prosecutors on suspicion of the crime of forging official documents to prosecute them. Tribunal found as early as last January, Zhou to the customer the same way a set of less than 5 years the resale by the fitness room, a commission from 2,500 yuan. Zhou, Lan A, the final result of a particular crime of forging official documents jailed. In view of Zhou, Lan a refund of the stolen money, a particular good attitude, a lighter prison sentence Zhou 1 year, 6 months imprisonment and a blue, a particular term of imprisonment for 8 months.
■ Interrupted

general rule of thumb that doubt

forged court judgments, how to transfer easily through the housing authority when the review? Housing authority's compliance with the appropriate review process? According to the housing authority in housing transfer ownership of staff to the reporters, in general, the court ruling when the case involves real estate, housing authorities need to first understand the housing situation. Less than 5 years by the fitness room, although not listed for trading, but debt. As for how to find out whether the verdict is false, the staff member said that the general rule of thumb can be found, that suspect will be the Court's advisory. Some people use ######## ID to do the transfer, have been found. Reporter Zhai

■ Other Mountains

courts and housing authorities can put an end to this network

how to avoid similar scams in the review stage of success? Chaoyang District, in dealing with similar issues have a better experience. Last December 1, Chaoyang District, Chaoyang Court and the Housing Authority launched the Housing Litigation Information Search and seizure of the direct entry system. Review of the court according to law, that the need for information on the Housing Litigation inquiries or to be sealed, may be under the authority of the Housing Authority, just click log query information and entry procedures for seizure, and then by the Housing Authority staff shared information platform review process. This work is not only easy to control and Litigation for the first time the court premises, but also may prevent the verdict was for using a forged transfer. Reporter Liu Jie