in the reform and opening up, to break the egalitarian distribution, we need to encourage some people get rich first.
China's economic development has been sustained and rapid growth of more than 30 years later, in some people get rich first has been significantly under the conditions of the problem in the polarization of wealth as a threat of the approa
ching trends and is an indisputable fact that the conditions, we must follow the requirements of the Fifth Plenary Session, unswervingly take the path of prosperity of the people sharing the fruits of reform and development efforts in which all people do their best, and live in harmony situation.
● realize common prosperity our country is facing the main contradiction is the difference between possession of the property and the resulting income gap.
second, Marxist political economy tells us that decided to allocate the production, possession of relations of production is to determine the relationship between income distribution, the fundamental factors. Led to the widening gap between rich and poor can not be the main factors of labor income, property income only. According to the data, the current income gap between urban and rural residents, the highest and lowest provincial income gap between the province and the industry the highest income and lowest income gap between the industry are about 3 times or more in some. However, the relationship between ownership structure and property are increasingly diversified, the most affluent and poorest sectors of the possession of the property, and the resulting income disparities, is a hundred thousand times or even very likely to meter times. The gap between labor income and property income gap compared to the shade.
then, the current realization of common prosperity of the major contradictions facing what is it? Possession of property and the resulting difference in the income gap, or whether the living conditions of workers of different contributions and the income gap caused it? The answer is likely to be the former but not the latter, it is because:
● income gap, especially the growing gap between the possession of property trends, if left unchecked and not be regulated, it will definitely lead to polarization between rich and poor.
reform and opening up, China's substantial increase in the income of the residents, but residents are also among the widening income gap. In response to this outstanding problem, the party and the government many times to be more concern about social equity, and strive to reverse the population trend of widening income gap between, and take the road of common prosperity. To achieve common prosperity are many issues involved, the most important point is the need to distinguish between two types of income are different in nature:
Summary
third party and the Government has been highly concerned about the issue of income distribution, the reason why people are not satisfied with the status of the distribution of income, not only because of the income gap between people is too large, more importantly,
michael jordan shoes for sale, This gap exists because many unfair and unreasonable factors, such as: high income, capital gains and weak regulation, illegal or irregularities caused by the technology, the spread of corruption trading power for money, employment, housing,
space jam jordans, medical care, lack of education, livelihood security, and so on. The most unfair and unreasonable situation seriously deviated from the principle of distribution according unreasonable and unfair distribution of property related.
a class of the income gap between workers in general, mainly due to the different departments, regions, the quality of workers among industries or the difference between contributions and the cost of living caused. For example, complex high-tech sector than other sectors of labor income of simple labor income, the cost of living of urban residents living costs higher than the farmers. Also exist in the real sector monopoly, imperfect labor market and wage system and other factors have a certain relationship. Such income gap reflects the distribution according to work requirements, help to mobilize the enthusiasm of producers, for which the factors you need to take reasonable measures to adjust.
Third, the state-owned enterprise workers with high incomes relative to the private sector in terms of low income workers, this is a matter of two aspects. Need to understand is that in the end is the high-income employees of state enterprises or private enterprises of the then low-income workers out? Need to study this problem, in fact, both state-owned enterprises or private enterprises, there is currently too low labor income,
alife parachute,
mbt tambo black 美宇航局发宇宙奇景 庆哈勃千里镜21岁诞辰(图), labor income is generally low has become a consensus. Therefore, the right idea should be in accordance with the seventh session of the Fifth Plenary Session pointed out, generally faster the income growth, efforts to improve income distribution in the proportion of national income and improve the work remuneration in primary distribution of income, and private enterprise is not in accordance with the requirements of state-owned enterprises to the low standards of income and welfare of workers. Of course, for monopoly industries and some management staff unreasonably high income is also needed to be limited,
嫦娥二号今日开始拍摄嫦娥三号首选落月地虹湾, but this is not the key to prosperity.
another place in different income gap between the possession of the property, especially between capital owners and workers, mainly because people in the property (including production, real estate, all kinds of financial assets and economic resources) share the possession of particular differences in production caused. Such income gap is the inevitable outcome of market economy, that will help the market mechanism, but without effective regulation, it will inevitably lead to property ownership and the polarization of income distribution: a great wealth in few hands is a constant accumulation and increases, the other pole is the relative poverty of most people live.
there is a very popular view is that, at this stage the expansion of China's income gap is the main source of state-owned economic monopoly, the monopoly sector income is too high. Therefore, the income distribution system reform of state-owned enterprise workers key is to limit the monopoly of state-owned enterprises, especially high income and welfare workers. This view is one-sided. We can not deny the monopoly elements of the income gap, but that does not lead to this stage, widening income gap in China the main reason.
first, and the common prosperity of wealth as opposed to polarization rather than the general income gap. We know the essence of socialism is liberation and development of productive forces, eliminate exploitation and polarization, and ultimately achieve common prosperity. Socialism is not against the labor income differential and the resulting differences in distribution according to work is the recognition of this difference. In the primary stage of socialism, the coexistence of diverse forms of ownership, property and even the exploitation of differences in scope and in a certain extent, also has its own rationality, but if a serious polarization in society, then clearly the essence of socialism is the phase violated. To achieve the goal of common prosperity, we must eliminate polarization.
Second, not all state-owned monopoly enterprises, in addition to power, oil, petrochemical, telecommunications, infrastructure operators, rail transportation,
足坛扫赌两问号本月揭开 南勇必死 扫黑结束 , tobacco and other monopoly industries have strong, the majority state-owned enterprises in China are in competition industry. Total employment in the community, the state-owned and state holding enterprises number of employees is only about 6% share, as employees of state enterprises monopoly industry practitioners in the whole population is minority. This small part of how the higher income workers to become fully sustainable expansion of the main reasons for income gap it? Also, if the state-owned monopoly is the main cause of widening income gap, then the dominant state-owned economy in the 80's or 90's, the income gap should be the maximum, with the proportion of state-owned economy shrinking, the income gap should be narrowed, but the fact quite the contrary.
First of all, the monopoly created by the expansion of income gap, mainly between the monopoly in the industry,
new ghd 2010, industry and non-monopoly sectors, between urban and rural areas it, as the income gap between regions, mainly labor incomes. The nature of the income gap and the difference from the property,
mbt womens shoes sale, or by capital allocation compared to the income gap caused by a secondary position, can lead to serious gap between rich and poor, but will not lead to the polarization of income distribution.
Fourth, the common wealth is not only essential requirement of socialist economy, but also the essential requirement of socialist politics. People's democracy is lifeblood of socialism, the people being the masters of the essence of socialist democracy and the core. And such a democracy only in the possession of the property, especially relative to production can be achieved on an equitable basis. If possession of the property in a serious polarization, in particular, the lifeline of national economy of production by a few private and private interests hold a monopoly, it is impossible to realize the people the masters of socialist democracy, will inevitably lead to serious social contradictions and undermine social stability, leading to social chaos, shaking the foundation of socialism with Chinese characteristics.
● China's economic development has been sustained and rapid growth of more than 30 years later, in some people get rich first has been significantly under the conditions of the problem in the polarization of wealth as a trend is an indisputable fact that under the conditions , we must unswervingly take the road of common prosperity.
how to achieve the common prosperity of the goal? Seventh session of the Fifth Plenary Session of the clear and specific measures, including national conditions gradually improved, more comprehensive, covering urban and rural areas, sustainable basic public service system, rationalize the distribution of income between urban and rural residents and improve the social security system, etc. . The most important thing is, we must distinguish the difference caused by the possession of property, the income gap and the difference caused by the labor income gap, so as to seize the key to the reform of income distribution. To achieve common prosperity, of course, need to increase the intensity of adjustment of income redistribution, but the primary distribution system and the property was fair and reasonable relationship of fundamental importance. (Tommy Author: Renmin University of China School of Economics)
a lot of people think that, as long as economic development, the widening income gap problem will be resolved naturally, some people get rich, and will naturally promote the common prosperity of the majority. This view separates the internal relations of production and distribution. In fact, the primary distribution relationship is a kind of production occurred in the field of economic relations, it is a direct relationship with the production of the same. Therefore, no allocation of relations, especially relations between the initial distribution of the rationalization of production is not developed. Proof of the actual situation, especially the income gap widening gap between the possession of property trends, if left unchecked and not be regulated, it will definitely lead to polarization between rich and poor.
new ghd 2010 Scholars the focus of the reform of
Linear Mode
