patent lawsuit against the company recognized the right of authorship in this case popular concern to the industry. Zhu Jin Yang, said the technical staff like him a lot of similar experiences, , in accordance with relevant laws and regulations, to give 2% of sales profit inventors. Therefore, the current case is being heard on the surface Jin-Yang Zhu is an indisputable right of authorship, but it is in the business interests behind the right of authorship into.
City Library library to find. For this project, he has done hundreds of experiments. In 2006, the basic development of successful products, the factory also began to declare the work of invention patents. In early 2009, the patent be authorized. But Zhu Jin Yang retrieve the patent to others in the commission, found the inventor of two patented signature, one of which is the Sun, but not the name of Jin-Yang Zhu.
The two sides agreed well. engaged in the project before the technical staff and the factory can be a sign an agreement, who agreed the name of the patent department, or a more direct point, the patent application to the technical staff after the success of how much money. stipulated clearly, you do not need lawsuit was.
in the end who is the inventor? The two sides heated debate
90's of last century, as a company in Changzhou, deputy director in charge of technology. The early 90s, is an enterprise of Changzhou Sun Group's head to find him, made him a month to 200 a week to the corporate guidance conductive rubber project preparation and operation. I did a lot of projects. Zhu Jin Yang can think of retirement to play a heat so I agreed, and the business he and Sun entered into a formal employment contract, the annual salary of 30,000. project is to study the production of gypsum, cement-based materials, two types of the two activities of the floor. Thus, Zhu Jin Yang spent the next two years on this project.
4 12, Changzhou City Intermediate People's Court case. Company as a defendant,
chanel sac, the head of Mr. Sun and Mr. Zhang undersigned patent to another as a
authorship may be agreed upon in advance and interests into
from the Earlier this year,
sac a main chanel, Zhu Jin Yang the old club to court. In the complaint, he said,
chanel 2.55, case.
on the day of the trial, the main focus of controversy is, Zhu Jin Yang, said in court, Inventors should be made the substantive features of the patent's contribution to the creative, and the experimental program by the Shi-degrees, Zhang Jianhua's, they should be the inventor of a patent case. The plaintiff is only responsible for the selection of raw materials, components testing, his work is complementary, not creativity. 相关的主题文章:
WELCOME TO MY COMPANY WEB:www.beatsbydreusa.com