He said: I do this because both Palestine and Israel can not tolerate and then waiting 10, 20 or 30 years to achieve peace ... I am not particularly original proposal of the Department. Over time, these parties negotiating framework is the basis for talks, including several former U.S. government. U.S. commitment to Israeli security, A
Palestinian illusions
next day, Netanyahu visited the United States, Obama send a punitive expedition. According to news from the White House, the two met alone in the White House, Netanyahu back to before the 1967 war borders, He even said that even if the Israeli-Palestinian peace, Israel must also be the junction of the Palestinian and Jordanian long-term military, Palestinian refugee problem must be within the framework of a Palestinian state, rather than in Israel to be addressed and so on.
First, he called Palestinian Palestine Liberation Organization Third, he was opposed to the Palestinians in the UN General Assembly in September this year,
all jordan shoes, U.S. officials have hinted it would use U.S. influence to stop the UN General Assembly passed such a resolution.
This is the first U.S. president to make such public statement, it seems to pressure Israel on the territorial issue to make major concessions on the Palestinian side,
tory burch bag sale 日本核电站事故调查验证委员会或, seems to correct the bias in line with the policy a big step forward.
but the American Jewish Committee was welcomed in a statement that Obama's sought before the founding of the practice of dialogue is stupid.
Rep. Bachmann said that Obama's speech was
angered Israeli Prime Minister rage
Obama won the 2008 election, Jewish voters played a crucial role. He was to be 78% Jewish voters overwhelmingly support the Republican candidate John McCain's Jewish support rate was only 21%.
we all know, Jews are America's Jewish voters and lobby groups in the United States has important political and economic influence. Almost say that no Jews to support the bill in Congress is difficult to get through; no support for the Jewish politicians, it is difficult to be successful.
former Republican U.S. House Speaker Newt Gingrich said it was the U.S. President issued a
taste, but if you look closely the expression of policy Obama's speech, it is easy to find, this does not mean the Palestinians got a set a number of prerequisites.
White House explained that Israel had
this, Netanyahu much wrath, insisted that Obama's speech put a But apparently the U.S. did not adopt his views.
Obama 22 in the
19, Obama called for Israel in a speech to the 1967 Middle East war, based on the boundary line before the negotiations with the Palestinians. This means that after 1967, demanding that Israel withdraw from occupied Palestinian land, the demolition of Jerusalem and the West Bank Jewish settlements.
potential Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney said in 2012, Obama Israel as a .
group of powerful U.S. Jewish lobby groups have expressed dissatisfaction with Obama's policy speech. Some U.S. Zionist organizations and Jewish organizations to support the right of Netanyahu's hard-line stance on Obama. There are Zionists who criticize the organization or even the history of Israel,
karen millen clothes To correct erroneous handling, the United States Barack Obama is the most unfriendly president.
busy with the Obama team to appease the Jews
Obama just delivered a speech on Middle East policy, 22 they immediately stressed that his policy was However,
nike air max tailwind 2010 mens, that was a big stir up trouble after his speech, the White House need to do now is to fill gaps,
salvatore ferragamo women shoes 港80后高薪族女比男, to appease, make it clear.
Obama's speech 19 hours before U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had called Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, The main content of Obama's speech communication, and
At the same time, the Obama campaign has sent the Commission's campaign director in 2008, one of the richest Jewish family members Peng 妮普利茨克,
nike air max trainer, go with some American Jewish leaders people exchange, eliminating their policy of Obama's
19
Nevertheless, this Republican is a Republicans criticized the speech for the Democratic Party Zhefan government, alienate Jewish voters relationship with the Democratic Party provides a great excuse. In recent days, criticized by Republicans for Obama, saying he
be Republican dismissed as Previous sessions of the U.S. government has a similar consensus, but Obama is now the first Middle East policy as it spoke out publicly.
seems like its many predecessors,
jordan retro, Obama wants the U.S. pro-Israeli policies even the slightest change in immune by his hard, and the consequences to bear.
these prerequisites are Palestinian institutions in the current situation is difficult to do, and it is some time before its internal integration and nation-building efforts for the negative.
Obama 19 at the U.S. State Department on the new Middle East policy speech, was intended to convey the United States on the Israeli-Palestinian peace talks, The result is rage Israel, the Palestinians are not satisfied. Then the entire weekend, the White House has been busy
positive initiative in its campaign to eliminate the Jewish community concerns of voters, while Obama himself Sunday (22) are also
2012 general elections nearing,
golf shafts, Democratic and Republican infighting has already begun. In this critical period, Jewish voters and Jewish groups for campaign contributions is particularly important. For the elimination of his speech to the American Jewish voters may cause negative effects, this weekend after his speech, Obama has not been able corpuscles.