trial, the trial judge to adopt the death, the Crime of murderer negligence, the case in movie surveillance, confession of the accused and the evidence, the defendant Wu Tan ahead reversing the motorcar did not inspect the situation,
nike air max 90 black black, there is not work on the behind until the car reversing radar, causing the victim was crushed rolling. Wu Tan by this time the defendant knocked the victim's subjective state of mind is apparently rolling negligence rather than intentional. Subsequently, the defendant did not timely correct Wu Tan causes to resolve traffic bumps open the conveyance along, causing the victim has been grinding roll, this period the defendant Wu Tan is still not entirely subjective to the obligation of attention negligence,
christian louboutin sandal Several staff chiefs ga, the defendant Wu Tan who has been aware of the problem and wish to obtain off the observation,
burberry poncho, the traffic ought be hanging in the parking stalls on the joystick, but the wrong tense and move the lever to the reverse gear on. Then get off their car ascertained underneath the victim, this time down soon after the vehicle has rolled to the victim, the defendant in order to dodge rolling the vehicle re-grind with the victim and want to elevate the arms traffic, but failed to lift, causing the victim to be crushed another rolling . The development of one integrated process of the entire case, the defendant's conduct caused the victim, nevertheless the objective was trampled vehicle rolled several times, but before, during, after the review to decide the circumstances, the defendant is not subjectively want alternatively laissez-faire serious consequences, According to the conviction of consistent subjective and objective, the court finds the defendant's conduct did not constitute intentional homicide.
It is understood that the case occurred, the relatives of the victims was December 8,
air jordan take flight, 2010 filed a civil action, the defendant and the landlord of Wu Tan Moumou civilian responsibility. The court presided over the mediation, the two sides reached a settlement agreement voluntarily, Wu Tan and co-owner wage for relatives of victims Moumou wage for death,
christian louboutin glitter pumps National class, funeral expenses and other economy losses. The entry into coerce and civil mediation dispatched, relatives of the victims to jot a written letter of understanding Yi (Xuzhou), April 29 (Xinhua)
Full Court also thought that after the incident the defendant actively call the police,
动车事故拷问央企垄断机制 设备采购仅限圈内, waiting for the public security division, a true account of facts of the crime, Department of concession may be lighter or mitigated punishment. Defendant pleads guilty, repent, and its close relatives such as loss of spirited compensation for relatives of victims and relatives of victims to win the understanding, can the defendant fitting sentences. According to The defendant's criminal court under the facts, nature, consequences, and its statutory and discretionary with the circumstances, sentenced the defendant to four years imprisonment Wu Tan.
court argue, the two sides focus of the debate focused on the defendant constituted negligence causing death or the Crime qualitatively. Prosecutors deem that, along to the relevant judicial interpretations of the incident, the zone has banned vehicles entering and leaving the community placards and assorted management systems, relatively closed road to the district tin not be simply identified as community roads, while the incident as a traffic event.
In appending, the presiding judge also explained that, wrongful death, lawful discipline is three to 7 years in prison. Surrender the defendant has a statutory mitigating or extenuating circumstances, and the defendant also has pleaded guilty to righteousness after a positive,
all air jordan, honest repentance, understanding and other relatives of victims made discretionary circumstances, it is their sentences. Combination of three to five years in prison prosecutor's sentencing recommendation, the final sentence in prison for 4 years the case.
court during the inquiry, as prosecutors charged the first group of evidence, the court play in full from the vehicle into the space to vigilant the defendant standing on the roadside five minutes eight seconds throughout the surveillance video. Communication with the network before the difference is that the video exhibit driver on the other side of youth children in car and went to the rear of vehicles during their reside, the way is all back to young children. It also shows that the driver did not run to the incident, but after almost 1 minute left called companions, and the phone shriek police at the scene side of the road.
Jiangsu Xinyi rolling 3-year-old children half to death. At that time chapter of the surveillance video online,
4 月 29 日 上午 9 30 AM, the closely watched case in Xinyi City People's Court held a public hearing, the regional NPC deputies and CPPCC members, medium correspondents, relatives of the victims, relatives of the accused and the public as approximately 200 human to attend the trial. After the trial, the tribunal later a collegiate court that the case made a decision to delinquency causing death of First Instance sentenced the defendant to Wu Tan sentenced to 4 annuals.
the defendant during the ultimate statement, expressed deep remorse because the families of the victims, said, ,
ferragamo discount, forgive my fault. motor vehicles within a residential road in reverse, it should forecast their action may endanger the safety of others, deserving to disregard of observations, the children playing in the car knocked down Qian Li Moumou, rolling, after the vehicle caused along unsuitable action Li Moumou rolling again, after an harm caused by Moumou death. The defendant's wrongful death act in consensus with ingredients of the crime, negligence causing death should be convicted and penalized.
of the defendant's behave would constitute the Crime of doubt, the presiding judge explained namely the main feud among the two charges namely the location apt look the accused crime. Traffic crime had happened within the range of management in public transport above the road, yet in this case catching area among a relatively closed community, no among the scope of management of public transport.
reporter eminent that the relatives of the accused during the trial and relatives of the victims were in the ############## face is tranquility, after the decree were not argued.
Photography: Chi sickness
prosecutor also submitted to the court, including the confession of the accused, spectator proof, forensic conclusions, vehicle inspection report, attribute management regulations, police records and other groups of evidence. None of the accused to challenge the evidence, counsel centered around the residential property management issues, the court asked the court to play cilia compartment vehicles difficulty free way to the video.
trial, prosecutors charged: September 7, 2010 11 am, the defendant Wu Tan BMW X6 off-road vehicles driving in the Garden District Xinyi xin'anzhen a truly nice time in front of Unit 3, Building 10 parking on the road from eastern to west, the road conditions due to neglect of the car observed the 3-year-old children Moumou semi knocked down, grinding roll, due to misjudgment after variant to the crushed car rolling Moumou prelude, The view off the stall when the hanging for of improper operation of the vehicle into reverse gear causing backward, causing the car on the left front and rear wheels grind again rolling Moumou, Li Moumou caused injuries, died at the hospital died the same daytime. In view of the spot after the incident, the defendant Wu Tan 110,120 alarm calls, and waiting to receive manipulation in place, can actively pleaded guilty, the defendant's relatives, the owners and relatives of the victims signed a compensation agreement, and paid compensation for death, funeral expenses, in feelingful and so on, relatives of victims to obtain understanding, is a statutory mitigating or extenuating circumstances, constitute negligence in court that the defendant caused the death of people profession for punishment to the defendant within the sentencing. The defendant has no criticism to the prosecutor declared.