and through inoculations

Should We Limit How Many Kids People Are Allowed To Have?,polo ralph lauren uk
About a third of people would like to see a limit on the number of babies a family can have. Apparently 29% would like to see it limited to one or two children,polo ralph lauren shirts, to stop over-population. The people behind the survey, the Optimum Population Trust say it's the only way to guarantee food supplies and cut carbon emissions.
So is this a good idea? Are out-of-control families with three or more children a massive burden on society that need to be controlled,nike football cleats, or is there anything to be gained from allowing families more than one child?
The case for the prosecution
There's no denying that kids are a burden on families and on the state. From the second they are born they start costing the NHS money, and through inoculations, swine flu jabs, peas stuck up noses, and measles they continue to see their doctor far more often in the first five years than for the next three decades.
Then there's the burden of their education. For the first thirteen years of schooling this falls to the tax-payer,nike soccer cleats, and then their parents struggle along with fees if their kids go on to university.
In many cases,mercurial vapor, one parent will give up work when the kids are young,soccer cleats, and the family will claim benefits or tax credits. At the very least they will get child benefit. If they have a bundle of kids, their child-rearing years could go on for decades, which is a serious drain on resources.
They clutter up the streets, walk very slowly,polo ralph lauren, clog the buses and disturb the sleep of the commuter - affecting productivity.
There are plenty of reasons to keep the numbers down.
The case for the defence
It's one of those inalienable rights. It's pretty hard to take it away from people without ringing some alarm bells. It is a short step from clamping down on the number of babies, to stopping people from going ahead with pregnancies where there is a chance of disability - because those with a disability may need help from the state throughout their lives. And we may not necessarily want to go there.


Health
Top Tips
Nutrition
Love
Lifestyle
Happiness
Weight Loss


You could argue that this is an investment. These burdensome kids are being kept healthy and educated so they are in a position to pay their taxes when they get older and support the next generation of kids - just like we are doing.
But the clincher for me is that these kids are going to keep us all in our old age. If we are really going to live into our nineties, how on earth would the country cope with a massive population of elderly people and a tiny number of youngsters desperately trying to earn the money we need to keep us in old age benefits and NHS treatment? At some stage we are going to be every bit as much of a burden as our kids, and unless we want to try to manage on our own,cheap polo ralph lauren, we're going to need those kids to help us get by.
But what do you think? Should we be limiting the number of children people are allowed?
Let us know in the comments.
相关的主题文章：


图文：轰-6油为歼8D战机加油_9698

图文：印度计划在中印边界地区部署烈火导弹_8392

such as from bandit signs