February of this year, the most severe in the history of the State Council issued the
still a week away from the end of the world, this reporter found that across the country, only about 40 cities this year announced its own price control objectives. Just announced no down regulation of the target word - most cities will be set at a local house prices rose about 10%.
which is the smallest increase in the less developed areas of Lanzhou. The price gains in 2011 to allow no more than 9%.
- part of the city control targets
Lanzhou: increase no more than 9%, lower than expected GDP growth of 14% and per capita disposable income of urban residents increased by 10% of the target.
Dandong: determine increase of not more than 9% -9.5%.
elm: 2011 new homes,
Xi'an: increase shall not exceed 15%. Xi'an this year, urban residents and rural residents per capita disposable income per capita net income growth target of 15%.
the sea: the city's rise is lower than the per capita disposable income of urban residents and the level of growth. 2011, Haikou City, urban per capita disposable income growth target of 10% or so.
Jinan: rose less than the per capita disposable income of urban residents and the level of growth.
Zhaoqing: not higher than the city's GDP growth rate this year.
Jiashan: rose no higher than the county's GDP and per capita disposable income of urban residents and growth.
Yichun: growth control in per capita disposable income of urban residents increased proportion of less.
Jinzhou: The average price increase of the development to no higher than 13%.
Kunming: increase disposable income can not exceed the level of growth. Second Five-Year Plan at Kunming, the city's per capita disposable income of urban residents and rural per capita net income growth target was 10%.
Yueyang: The average price increase of less than 10%.
Shenyang: less than current disposable income of urban and economic growth (these two indicators is the target of 12%).
Hefei: rose no higher than the annual GDP and disposable income growth rates.
Guiyang: no higher than the national average. Yinchuan: the rise in the current per capita disposable income of urban residents and the growth rate of less (per capita disposable income growth target of 10%).
released into the city is still less than one
Beijing Times reporter, according to incomplete statistics, as of yesterday, the city announced goal of price regulation over 600 cities for less than ten percent .
present, only 22 cities in Shanxi and Yinchuan, Guiyang, Kunming, Foshan, Yueyang, Shenyang, Dandong, Haikou, Hefei, Lanzhou, Xi'an, Jinan, and a total of 40 cities announced its own price control objectives.
The published price control objective point of view, there is no mention of a city, growth.
which targets some of the city's price control, with local GDP growth and per capita disposable income growth was flat.
such cities, to Xi'an. Xi'an city government is given control objectives: new homes in Xi'an in 2011 shall not exceed 15% gain. Xi'an this year, urban residents and rural residents per capita disposable income per capita net income growth target of 15%.
So far, the smallest gain control targets in the less developed areas are located in Lanzhou. The local new home in 2011 to allow price increases do not exceed 9%, lower than expected GDP growth of 14% and per capita disposable income of urban residents increased by 10% of the target.
second-tier cities is not only a rise in the price - the price control objectives town of Dandong, identified in the
now we know that regulation and control targets in the city have been published, the most generous target non Elm none other - the city provides new housing in 2011, growth,
tier cities are still kept secret
Although the deadline from the State Department released only 4 days, but in Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou and Shenzhen several times of soaring prices of these old first-tier cities, for control goal is still secret.
contrast, in 2010, into the regulation and control in the era of the Chinese real estate market after the previous State Department's regulatory policies, the first-tier cities are the first to follow local rules in recent years.
in ten countries, for example, April 17, 2010 the State Council issued the Shanghai, Shenzhen and other cities have followed suit.
the reasons for the situation? Housing and Urban Policy Research Center Director Wang Jue Lin's analysis, the country eight stipulates that local governments according to local economic development goals, per capita disposable income growth and residential housing affordability, reasonable assurance that the area year new housing price control objectives.
Wang Jue Lin believes that first-tier cities like Beijing and more difficult, local governments look at each other, cross-reference can be understood, so the delay did not come out around the control target, but he believed that before the end of the city's regulation of all objectives can be published.
For the current price control targets have been published, he does not questioned, nor evaluation of the level of housing prices in these cities.
rose 10% to ensure the completion of
10% rise in space, whether it is
he said, bear the heavy responsibility of stimulating the local economy real estate,
mens asics, individual local governments may not want to control. Published in the current year these cities rose about 10% of the price control objectives, and fully explain the reluctance of local governments emotions can also be said to be tentative.
CHENGUI that the main factors affect the price of two, one is supply and demand, the other is expected. On the current market, demand or greater than the supply, upward pressure on prices in the next 10 years, have been there. If you do not control policies introduced, buyers who would agree that housing prices in anticipation of this, house prices rose faster. The heavy pressure on the two-tier cities is greater and therefore difficult to set goals. But in the face of the accountability system the State Council, local governments had to work out a target.
Chen Gui said, will be able to fulfill the task of lower fear, so the local government will be higher. In addition, 1,000 million units this year to determine the protection of housing, not the formation of the current supply, in the end will have an impact on the market who are not sure, and they protect the housing market have to wait until after the National Day in succession, (for local governments) and its risks, it is better to give yourself a loose indicator to ensure that the end objectives.
land finance still gotta play
Albert I love my family, group vice president 胡景晖 held the same judge. In his view, although last year were real estate regulation, but the land around the real fiscal change did not occur, so that local governments take the initiative to lower prices, makes no sense logically. Therefore, the development can achieve a relatively
he is optimistic about - around the control indicators published so late, and even some cities have not yet been published, reflecting the local government of the This is better than a set number of racking our brains, hastily announced that exist in name only better.
control objectives of the city have been published, most of the reference standards set around the GDP and per capita disposable income growth rates.
胡景晖 that, GDP, per capita disposable income, housing prices, CPI between, indeed there should be a relatively reasonable scientific data system and proportional relationship. reflect the residents to enjoy the full fruits of economic growth, but also reflects increasing the value of the property, but also make people feel more and more affordable house. The day we will be better. 胡景晖 that the control objectives is just a simple number, be a problem - in order to complete the figure, the relevant agencies can not open 高档房, increase rural housing supply and so on, driving down house prices index.
Guang-Yuan Mar Academy of Social Sciences Ph.D. in economics is that the State Council, the regulation requires local governments to publish objective, and comprehensive account of local economic development objectives, growth rate of per capita disposable income of residents in housing affordability and the three factors. Residents of the local government is clearly missing an important factor in housing affordability in this.
Guang-Yuan Mar, for example, if a city's price is 10,000 yuan a square meter, while the per capita income was 3,000 yuan. 1 million up 10% of the price of 1,000 yuan, 3,000 yuan, up 10% of salary is 300 yuan, so the implementation of people's income and house prices still worse the greater the regulation and control is the purpose?
Guang-Yuan Mar said, in the micro-economics theory have called the income elasticity. The so-called flexibility, changes in each of these factors is the impact on prices will be different. For example, the cabbage rose 10% rise on the economic impact of a city may be only 3%, 4%, while house prices rose 10% rise on the economic impact of a city may be more than 10%. Can not be compared.
he said, Under the current prices, how to control objectives and GDP growth and per capita disposable income growth linked? Policy formulation, (we) do not violate common sense.