Net posts , said the value of 1.5 billion to 5 mil

online post

According to post descriptions of the land secured by an enterprise of Anhui and South Tech dispute (dispute the total 17 million), South Tech Qinhuai prosecution to the court for money, the partiality of the judge (to be submitted by the enterprise in Anhui province two written evidence as
Posted think Qinhuai court auction process in the present assessment and capricious behavior. First, select the assessment of the company, the first time, without notice to participate in selection of an enterprise of Anhui assess the company's meeting, resulting in the company's right to choose, and ultimately with the creditors to specify the filed objections to the assessment before anything. The second time, Qinhuai court
Posted described in the auction process is highly irregular. Assessment came out, preservation law
Posted by saying

friends together loans from disputes

post in the Last night,polo ralph lauren, Mr Chan confirmed that the company executives to net posts is it, and stressed that
Chen introduction, he is a friend with the tech company executives in 2006, the two companies are looking for bank loans, Seiko has a piece of land in Ma On Shan, High-tech companies in the bank relationship, the two executives decided to Cooperation: Seiko Corporation to provide land security, tech companies to obtain bank loans, funds a half. In 2006, the tech companies were to get 24 million yuan loan, the two companies use 12 million each. Loans due after one year, cash flow due to the inconvenience Seiko Corporation, please High-Tech company for the repayment.
2007, the High-Tech company with a 22 million piece of land Xudai, the Seiko company only took 500 million, and the remaining 17 million by the High-tech companies. Mr Chan did not deny tech companies Precision 17 million owed by the company, but he thinks, of which 12 million should be recognized as loans or debts, the money does not matter with the bank in repayment of the bank, he should still only 500 million. Because of this, the two sides agreed in the cooperation agreement supplementary note The loan expires, the Seiko company was not any timely repayment, the two sides brought before the court. Court said it was slip of the pen, the ratio changed to
tricky choosing evaluation company

Chen stressed that the assessment of the first companies selected, they are Shake out the assessment, including Jinning Da, including the three companies. The judge gave the 15-day understanding of, Seiko company representatives did not agree for the extension to 30 days, was the judge refused.
By law, the debtor during the 15-day understanding of the assessment can be selected 摇号 challenged the company, including the fact or qualification defects and other irregularities, the Seiko company has not raised objection to it ? Chen answer: no. Because in the second working day after 摇号, he was informed that Jin Ningda determined to assess: He is another unhappy is that the court does not agree to select Anhui assessment company.
assessment came out, Mr. Chen Jin Ningda Trustee company investigated and found that the company had been accepting huge bribes evil deeds, then to reflect to the court, but the court has not been ignored.
than two years ago, the assessed value is lower

mainland company in July 2007 the company commissioned by the High-Tech Precision assessment of the company's two pieces of land (to apply for a loan) then assess the price of 56.106 million yuan, and in July 2009, the company commissioned by the Qinhuai court to assess the price actually dropped to 52.2885 million yuan.
However, the second randomly selected Jinning Da's assessed value is only 53.92 million yuan. is 1.4505 billion.
court response

assessment company is randomly generated

yesterday afternoon, Qinhuai court official said the court in this case all the procedures are strictly according to law. July 2007, Hi-Tech Company and Seiko have economic disputes, the court applications under the High-Tech company, in December 16, 2008 that sealed the two pieces of land in Ma On Shan. After trial, the court Qinhuai January 2009 and March, respectively, judgments, judgments against the company Seiko tech company to pay security deposit and interest, liquidated damages, a total of 25 million yuan. After the commencement of the two judgments, Seiko company does not perform, then apply for assessment of tech companies, the auction company was sealed Seiko two pieces of land.
assessment is randomly generated, the candidate is reviewed by provincial and municipal courts with the appropriate qualifications adopted by the 7 companies, the first randomly generated land valuation firms in mainland China, Nanjing, Seiko was no objection . Two pieces of assessed value of land is 5228 million yuan, the Seiko company challenged because the land in 2007 for mortgage loans, Hi-Tech company commissioned two pieces of land on this continent valuation assessed, then assess the price is 5610 million yuan, obviously unreasonable. Qinhuai court adopted its opinion, re-assessment of randomly selected estate consulting firm in Jiangsu Jin Ningda assess the price of 5392 million yuan. Seiko Corporation challenged this result, Qinhuai's Court rejected.
Qinhuai court explained to those concerned, the court auction of selected institutions in the People's Court should be commissioned to assess the agency to open the register selected random manner, the parties have no right to choose their own assessment of the auction sector,mercurial vapor superfly, net posts said the court denied the parties the right choice for an auction of the company, which is legally untenable.
why the two pieces of land auction

Qinhuai court to pay 25 million yuan Seiko Company, two pieces of land in the assessment of price or whether it is 145 million more than 5300 million, are far greater than the 2500 million, the court why the excessive attachment?
Court explained that two pieces of land are interdependent relationship, in the use of non-points, a block of 2.6 million square meters, 5,500 square meters block B, B is a nearly 90 plots degrees around the corner a block long strip of land, can not be used alone, but not enough to repay the relevant amount of land value. A separate auction of land not only seriously detract from its value, but also affect its use, because the B block of the land must be used. Supreme Court provides that such cases should be merged auction.
auction before the Court in Nanjing, the newspaper announcements are made, the Supreme Court, to apply for executors, If the person can participate in the auction, so the tech companies to participate in non-malicious,
1.45 亿, or more than 5,300 million?
a company in Anhui Province (also for the assessment agencies appointed by the court) the evaluation was 1.45 billion, while the court 摇号 Qinhuai Jiangsu Jin Ningda selected for the 5392 million yuan to assess the price, why the same land difference so big?
introduced, according to Qinhuai Court, Ma On Shan Land Office in January 2010 on the site Maanshan published benchmark price of land shows that Seiko is a name of B grade Ⅲ two to land, commercial land prices per square base m 939 yuan, according to this standard, and B is the benchmark price in 3012 two million yuan. Court of the implementation process to assess the price is 5392 million yuan, much higher than this figure. In fact, the real value of the land can be reflected through public auction, the basis to assess the price is only for reference to assess the value of the land does not affect the level of the real transaction price.
1.45 亿元 5392 million yuan of land and land prices, which is more reasonable? Qinhuai court official said the court all work is carried out strictly according to law, the court can not assess the company's assessment of any intervention, it is impossible to assess themselves. If the assessment's findings are biased, which they have to bear the corresponding legal responsibility.
correct The slip of the pen is how is it? The judge said that mortgage 22 million yuan, Hi-Tech company paid 17 million yuan to the Seiko counter guarantees, then it is clear that in the loan, the tech companies should pay the bank 500 million, while the Seiko company should also bank 17 million yuan . But the two sides agreed in the written supplementary agreement and Seiko at Tech, 500 million, Seiko Corporation of appeal against sentence, the Nanjing Intermediate People's Court upheld the conviction.