GoogleI / O thoughts after
highlights excerpts:
1, as long asApple and Google's full championship
2, Apple have the advantage - the user experience, industrial design, consistency. Google - Cloud Computing, diversity and openness.
3, Apple now faces the challenge that they had not shown that they can get rid of USB, turned to the clouds. Wireless synchronization, backup and update the system needs some (Apple's MobileMe,
GHD Hair Straightener, notwithstanding the cloud, but the high charges,
GHD Carry Case Styler, it is said to be free)
4, the biggest loser this week to the number of Microsoft, and they even had no chance to compete
5, but Microsoft do? They did not. Lack of charming products, inert sales and a dwindling group of users;
6, Nokia's sales volume is ten times the Apple, but Apple still higher than the Nokia big profits.
7, Gartner reported, Windows Mobile smartphone sales in the global market share was only 6.8%. A year ago, or 10.2% of the (report also said that, iPhone has a market share of 15.2%, while the Android 9.6%).
8, at the Google I / O keynote, they were not even mentioned even once! Indeed mini contingency is worked.
----- The emulating are newspaper reports -----
News source: DARING FIREBALL
This is a John Gruber at May 22, 2010 promulgated in his private blog DARING FIREBALL the story. Detailed thinking of the Google I / O after, Apple, Google and Microsoft compete in the platform's character changes. - Ilizc
Google I / O behind, iPhone and Android competition seems fewer obvious, merely as long asApple and Google's overall competition. This is a stately outdated merely competitive. We all like to watch this intense, even fierce competition, and we consumers ambition be the ultimate beneficiaries of this competition. Competition, subserve innovation, meantime innovation is the new technology, new technology sources. It is because of innovation, a variety of intelligent machines with new features proceed to appear in recent annuals. Like before history of the competition for human memorize, Apple and Google both do not hold every other's core strengths are, and they both attempt to use their gist strengths to define this new market.
Apple have the avail of what is it? - User experience, industrial design, consistency. Google? - Cloud Computing, variety and openness.
in Froyo numerous new features, most people feel is perhaps interesting to Google in the I / O keynote residence shown on the Here is an instance of the use of this API: You can use PC's explorer in the Android Marketplace to buy one petition (melodies, or additional), then choose 1 of them related with your list Android production, you will must buy something transmitted through the telegraph network instantly to your Android products.
Similarly, the same way you can use your current computer's browser to the address on the wireless network to your Android, if a web sheet, this sheet will open on Android's browser, if it is a Google Maps the URL, the link will map through the Android application opens.
data backup and data revitalization in this regard, iPhone has the absolute advantage of Android, which purchased a new iPhone or upgrading a new system, you can use iTunes on the PC to re-sync, before you purchased applications or data will be restored (3GS recently upgraded to OS 4 betas, I base that even before the open on the page MobileSafari was restored) Android does not have what aspect of feature, design, after a system, Android, and there is no provides a way for users to return data, Google is immediately trying to addition the application of cloud-based backup microprocessor to recompense for this deficiency. This reach is feasible: Android to buy a new product, record in to your Google account, your computer before the existence of cloud applications and data can be sent to the wireless network on your Android.
currently not on Google Android, alike to the iPad such products, but we clearly kas long assimilar products will presently be listed. As I mentioned in My iPad review as, iPad most curious experience for you when you type out the box when they feel: the iPad when you first bring an end to ... of the box, the first entity you to do is use the USB wire to interlock to your Mac or PC, then synchronize with iTunes. iPad in this area also many like the iPhone. IPad USB is the only able to migrate melody, video and email account way. If you do not use the words of MobileMe, your contacts and calendar only through this way. In common, people feel very behind in this way. This can not aid but calculate that iPad is not a detach product, like a child still need their parents to a standing ovation the same. Then, relatively speaking, he is more like a teens, not a youth baby, it is seen to be independent of ability, and people meditation he should himself growing.
we can clearly see the iPhone OS and Android are leading the future of post-PC epoch, I said PC is the Mac and Windows both. Simple is the advantage of this mobile device, but also thought that a PC can do many things they can not do, iPhone OS depends on the PC, iTunes and the USB to make up for this deficiency. The Android is dependent on the cloud. Dependent on the PC to transfer data after the fact should not be something PC epoch. The challenges currently facing Apple is that they have not shown that they can get rid of USB, cornering the clouds. Wireless synchronization, export and update the system needs some Perhaps not a chance this week to the digit of Microsoft's largest losers, and they even had no chance to compete. RIM appears to be very mighty, because Blackberrys in the U.S. smartphone market continues to reserve the sales caption. But Microsoft do? They did not. Lack of attractive products, sluggish sales and a shrinking group of users. Microsoft changed the least is taken for acknowledged. Google in the I / O keynote address at the tit for tat with the iPhone, but they are more of a estate of the Microsoft original market. Apple and RIM's tactics is to internalize the hardware and software. And Google is playing with Microsoft's strategy - to many manufacturer's licensed their development platform. Microsoft is not the biggest problem facing the market can not exist two authorized platform, but Microsoft's success is based on if their absolute control platform for the market.
is ideal, Apple in the future can hold about 20-25% market share. In PC sales accounted for only 5% of global PC sales, but its brought great profits. The reason is very easy, because all Apple products are concentrated in the medial and high-end market. In today's mobile phone market, all the phones, not just smartphones, Nokia's sales volume is ten periods the Apple, but Apple still higher than the Nokia big profits. If Microsoft holds in the mobile platform is very small, they can not survive. Their licensing model is based on the amount of - relatively low price multiplied by a big profit. 400-600 dollars they are not selling phones, they are just 8-15 in which the U.S. system to earn licensing fares. But Google allows operators and contractors to use Android system for free, Google not only has an advantage in the license price, and in Windows Phone 7 came out,
GHD Straighteners, Android has amassed two years of the competitiveness and market share.
3 years ago, when the recently launched iPhone, Steve Ballmer said in an interview on USA Today's David Lieberman said: iPhone can not get much market share. That chance. It is a 500 dollars value of products and government perquisite, which may be can send them huge profits, but if you see at that 1.3 billion mobile phones creature sold, I'd preferably have 60% or 80% of the market and do not the 2% or 3% market share, even if it brings the profit objective. And that microscopic market share, Apple will get it. Steve Ballmer is not only underestimated the iPhone,
GHD Blue Styler, but too overestimate their own Windows Mobile. Three years ago he said was 60%, 70% or even 80% market share, this week, Gartner reported, Windows Mobile smartphone sales in the global market share was only 6.8%. A year ago, or 10.2% of the (report also said that, iPhone has a market share of 15.2%, while the Android 9.6%). Microsoft can not contend on price with the Android, but can chance increasingly visible that, Microsoft in features and user experience is likewise very difficult to grab up on the Android. In Google I / O keynote, they were not even mentioned even once! Indeed little chance is gone.
http://daringfireball.net/2010/05/post_io_thoughts
Post-I / O Thoughts
Saturday, 22 May 2010
Post-Google I / O, there's not many apartment left to see iPhone-vs.-Android as everything other than an all-out campaign. What we've got here is a agreeable old-fashioned epic rivalry.
It's exciting, vicious, fun to see, and ultimately ought certify to be great news for clients. Competition pedals innovation and innovation raises the bar as everyone. And the bar, because smartphones, is rising fast.
Like anyone magnificent rivalry, there are emphatic differences between the two opponents. Apple and Google are jostling to shift the approximation among the two platforms to their quite assorted strengths. Apple's strengths: user experience, devise, consistency. Google's strengths: the smoke, variety, permissiveness.
The most interesting upcoming Android feature that Google demoed at I / O is a
■ Buy an app (just aboutng,
GHD Diamond Flag Styler, or anything) from the Android Marketplace using a PC web browser, elect one of your Android devices, and the item you just purchased will be pushed directly to that device over the air.
■ Take the current URL from your PC web browser and move it to your appliance, over the wind. If it's a web page, it'll open in the Android web browser; if it's a Google Maps URL, it'll open in the Android Maps app.
One zone where the iPhone has been distant ahead of Android is in terms of backing up and restoring file. Buy a fashionable iPhone, or setup a major OS update, and when you re-sync with iTunes above your desktop, all your apps and data are re-installed. (After upgrading my 3GS to the iPhone OS 4 developer betas recently, I noticed that even the web pages I'd left open in MobileSafari were restored.)
Android doesn't have that. Upgrade to a new Android device, and there is no way to transfer your data from the old device to the new one. Google is upping the ante on the iPhone here, though, by joining cloud -based data backup for Android applications. The way it should work: get a new Android device, log in with your Google account, and your apps and data are restored to the device, over the air.
Android has nought today that competes with the iPad. But we entire know Android-based iPad-like tablets are surely coming.1 As I noted in my iPad reiterate,
GHD Hair Ireland, the oddest portion of the iPad experience namely what happens when you first take it out of the box:
One thing that is very iPhone-like about iPad is that when you first take it out of the box, it wants to be plugged into your Mac or PC via USB and sync with iTunes. In some ways, that's understandable. USB syncing is how you load your iPad with music and videos and transfer over matter like your email accounts, and, if you're not using MobileMe, your contacts and calendars. But, on the entire, it feels retrograde. It creates an impression that the iPad does not stand on its own. It's a child that still needs a parent. But it's not a young child. It's more like a teenager. It's near. So close that it feels like it should to be able to stand on its own .
It's obvious that iPhone OS and Android devices are paving the access to a post-PC hereafter, where by that they can't do everything a PC tin. iPhone OS devices rely above a PC, iTunes, and USB syncing to manage this gap. Android devices rely upon servers in the cloud.
Relying upon a PC is ipso facto not and system updates need to be something that
'No Chance'
The big loser this week, though, was Microsoft. They're simply not even part of the game. RIM looms massive, as BlackBerrys continue to dynasty as the best-selling smartphones in the US But Microsoft? They've got nothing. No interesting devices, weak sales, and a shrinking user found. Microsoft's irrelevance is taken for granted.
Google's competitive converge on the iPhone at I / O was intense and scathing. But it's Microsoft's luncheon they're dining. Apple's and RIM's game is selling the integrated whole - their own devices, escaping their own software. Google is playing Microsoft's game - licensing a platform to many device producers.
The big problem for Microsoft is not that there isn't, in methodology, room for more than one licensed mobile platform, but rather that Microsoft's model hinges upon monopoly-sized market share. Apple could positively thrive with a long-term mobile market share of, say, 20-25 percent. In the PC manufacture, Apple generates an outsized share of the profits antagonism selling only 5 percent of the total units worldwide, because all of Apple's PCs are in the medium and high price scope of the market. In the phone industry today - all mobile phones, not just smartphones - Nokia sells more than 10 times as many units as Apple, but Apple generates more profit.
Microsoft can't afford for its mobile platform to account for just a sliver of the industry's unit sales. Their copyrighting model is all about volume - cheap per-unit profits multiplied by an enormous number of units. They're not selling $ 400-600 phones, they're selling $ 8-15 licenses for an OS.
But Google lets carriers and handset makers license Android for free. And not only has Google tear the base out of the market price-wise, as long as Windows Phone 7 phones really come to market, Android will have two complete years of impetus and market share after it.
Three years ago, fair ahead the aboriginal iPhone boated, here's what Steve Ballmer said in an interview with America Today's David Lieberman:
sold, I'd choose apt have our software in 60 percentage alternatively 70 percent or 80 percentage of them, than I would to have 2 percent or 3 percent, which is what Apple might obtain.
Not merely was he bad almost the iPhone, but he was even extra wrong approximately Windows Mobile. Three years ago Ballmer was talking about 60, 70, 80 percent market share. This week, Gartner reported that Windows Mobile has dripped to 6.8 percent market share in international smartphone bargains, down dramatically from 10.2 percent a year antecedent. (The same report puts iPhone OS at 15.2 percent, and Android at 9.6.)
Microsoft can't undercut Android on price, and it seems increasingly unlikely that they can blow Android in terms of features or experience. They didn't warrant even a passing reference from Google at I / O. No chance, absolutely.
-------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------
1.Although there's still no chaste Android-based equivalent to the iPod Touch. ↩
Thoughts afterward GoogleI O
Linear Mode
