chi cheap Female partner is an indisputable title

this, Pangmou found at the time when the leadership of Trade and Industry Bureau of students, and then funded by the Qiumou 80000, Pangmou invested 1.5 million, a total of 95,000 yuan, and the rest of the arrears in the payment the name of the day to Pangmou to the Trade and Industry Bureau issued 4.5 million owed to data.
2009, Liaoning Supreme Court heard the case again, the court finds that the fundamental reason is that the case before the parties in the partnership, not enter into a written partnership agreement, rights and obligations are not clear. The application for a retrial against the parties several times a cause and a focus of controversy over the case, the property is a partnership of public toilets that are common there, or by shares.
Yue Wei) to compete for a public toilet,keen mens, the original as close as sisters,chi cheap, friends to court.

case after 10 years, the Liaoning Provincial Higher People's Court of Final Appeal ruled that a partnership for the purchase of the parties should be recognized as a public toilet by shares.





10 years ago
After the verdict, both of Appeal, after two appeals, after remand, 2003 by the Jinzhou Intermediate People's Court after the ruling,lebron dunk, upheld the original verdict.

1999 年 Heishan County People's Court after the verdict: lifting Qiumou partnerships with Pangmou; toilet by shares, that Qiumou 10.25, Pangmou 3.75.
this ruling, to pay more Qiumou 2006 Provincial Court Supreme Court orders retrial in the case of Jinzhou.


Recently, the reporter learned from the Provincial Higher People's Court, the


Comics


Qiumou made with Pangmou ownership and operation of the toilet after co-partnership, in addition to daily expenses and the amount in default, the profitability of investment in some proportion by both sides. Until finally in 1998 the two sides of the 4.5 million owed to pay off the Trade and Industry Bureau. However,timberland kids,chi Guangdong has gone through the years that are, with the mall business, fire, high traffic, public toilets and also followed to make money,shoes by christian louboutin, Qiumou and Pangmou are no longer willing to partnership, from the property in 1999 began to compete for the toilet.
case hit the Supreme Court from the County Court




but for this result,chi Classroom teachers lost to the whole class to, Qiumou still have objections, and once again apply to the provincial Supreme Court for retrial. To this end, the Provincial High People's Court in 2007 heard the case, maintaining Jinzhou Intermediate People's Court made the ruling in late 2006. But still not satisfied with the verdict Qiumou to the Supreme People's Court retrial, the Supreme Court in November 2008 ruled that the Supreme Court orders retrial of Liaoning Province.


two people in the business partner of the toilet
To this end,christian louboutin bianca Deputy Secretary for drunk drivin, the Provincial Supreme People's Court of Final Appeal ruled that the maintenance of Jinzhou City in 2003 after the Intermediate People's Court's decision. Revoked in 2007, 2006, 2004, the Province and Jinzhou Intermediate People's Court Supreme Court 3 ruling.
10 years

the
2006 year-end, re-trial by the Jinzhou Intermediate People's Court, the decision by the Qiumou partnership property and Pangmou toilet of the common to the dispute toilet Since the Court ruled that after the expiry of the implementation, operation turns the Qiumou and Pangmou a period limited to one year.

trial of two times the total Qiumou taken to court for the lifting of a partnership, recognized by shares of the property. Meanwhile, Pangmou proposed counterclaim, for the lifting of partnership, equal division of partnership property, the property of their joint operation of all toilets.
two friends fighting over the property a public toilet in court
1994 年 Heishan integrated market transformation of Jinzhou City store floor, all the unsold public toilets one was as close as sisters Qiumou and Pangmou saw an opportunity.
share for both sides, the two sides of the original capital contribution ratio of 8:1.5, the Industry and Commerce Bureau during the operation of 4.5 million loan, the borrower, although the name is Pangmou play IOUs, but the fact is that both sides to partnership joint debt owed to public toilets, and the sum of debt has been co-operating with the proceeds of repayment period. Provincial Supreme Court therefore finds that the share of both the public toilets should be 8 = 3.75 +2.25 +2.25 = 10.25:1.5.
Lo Wei
after Pangmou again appeal. In 2004, the Jinzhou Intermediate People's Court retried the case. Court, after hearing from the partnership activities that occur during partnerships to identify the nature of the decision by the partnership property, public toilets and Pangmou Qiumou joint tenancy.