,
asics shoes gel
Court held that the procedures for surrender , the insurance company does not watch the power of attorney , but after Ms. Gao fill , upon the signature of Mr. Gao is not himself . In counting, the insurance plan plainly provides that: the insured to terminate the contract should be with the insurance contract and the last - time remittance certificate , insured for family registration certificate or testimony of personality . And Mr. Gao - straight well preserved two insurance contracts. Therefore, the defendant in July 2005 as the daughter of Mr. Gao 's policy for replacement procedures and materials relative to surrender not only unlawful , rift of contract and violation of the relevant provisions of the statute should be satisfied that the surrender invalid . Defendant,
Jordan 6 rings shoes 三轮车夫与弱智女同居 是否涉嫌强奸引争议, the plaintiff insurance company should handle matters relative to surrender and return two of the policy cash merit insurance contracts 27,998 yuan .
It is understood that , in May 2002 , Yantai Muping of Mr. Gao Lao for their insurance - and copies of commercial insurance , in October , he was assured for his wife - were commercial insurance . October 2008 , Mr. Gao Lao hospitalized , after discharge , he queried the insurance company claims ,
men nike air max 95, the insurance company told the elderly surmised , he insured the 2 insurance for early as three years ago has been surrender ,
asics kayano 17, the refund is also led away . Mr. Gao Lao am quite confused, he did not surrender to the insurance company , led along whom the money is worked ? Insurance company to surrender the old produced materials , the elderly began to fulfil namely his daughter three years ago for his back guarantee .
newspaper Yantai September 2 (Reporter correspondent Ju Ping Mou means alleged ) 3 years antecedent, a mystery high- back vouch because the parents , taken away a refund , but did not tell his household said . Three years after , his dad for he was hospitalized,
inexpensive wind Jordan 10 景区两游客团因插队纠纷,
air max 97, later dismiss claim no only the know , and the insurance company reported to the court .
June of this annual , the court of second example to maintain - the trial determination . The case has been executed.
last year , the elderly will be the insurance corporation to court . Trial , the defendant insurance enterprise ,
buy nike air max 95, said Mr. Gao had existed with the insurance companies do their contractual relationship ,
running shoes online 清洁工捡身份证后卖给假证贩子 每张十元, yet Mr. Gao 's daughter in July 18, 2005 , Mr. Gao has been the attorney who handled the concession procedures ,
asics trainer, so the incipient defendant 's there is not insurance contract between the long relationship , it should discharge the plaintiff's demand .