The changing face of identity and location security
For two decades, the dominant security model has been location-centric. We instinctively trust insiders and distrust outsiders, <a href="http://www.beatsfromdredrebeats.com/beautiful-diddybeats%C3%A2%C2%84%C2%A2-high-performance-inear-headphones-with-controltalk%C3%A2%C2%84%C2%A2-pink-p-5730.html"><strong>headphones by dr dre</strong></a> so we build security to reflect that: a hard perimeter surrounding a soft inside. The model works best when there's only one connection to the outside, offering a natural choke point for firewall defense. Of course, nowadays most of the operating assumptions behind this model <a href="http://www.guccibags-discount.com/chanel-vintage-quilted-backpack-p-6965.html"><strong>chanel purse prices</strong></a> are false. The perimeter is permeated by dozens of connections to the outside world. Mobile devices and users regularly cross the perimeter and plenty of "outsiders" have access to company resources. <a href="http://www.guccibags-discount.com/prada-c-16.html"><strong>prada bags</strong></a> But the most glaring discrepancy is that we treat network identifiers (IP addresses) as authoritative identifiers even though they are fleeting and imprecise. IN PICTURES: 10 scariest hacks from Black Hat and Defcon To continue reading, register here to become an Insider. You'll get free access to premium content from CIO, Computerworld, CSO, InfoWorld, and Network World. <a href="http://www.ciaa.cn/plus/guestbook.php"><strong>Revolution 30 Performance Jersey-nbajerseysok-ZOL博客</strong></a> See more Insider content or sign in.
|