A charge of money treatment exercise, the red and black is often the highlight of the game. The company also introduced a kind of training different versions, different focusing of the game, participate athletes going through a very tough game, the often prolific, even saying Hu Empowerment feeling. Common experience is: a win-win cooperation, and kindness, tolerance and so on. But if understanding this stop, the worth of the game, in fact, most are a waste.
game told us, just cooperation and win-win situation? Revealed in the game, only the depths of human selfishness, contracted, uncooperative, bad faith, feisty, cats and dogs, duplicity? Not only that.
Let's see at the whole process of the game (deserving to the design of the contents of the another companies, where the standard version, for instance):
staff organization:
group of people will be divided into A, B groups, two groups allowed between the commutes, after inner discussions, the cards to each other after the vote, the cards can only be red and black. To keep separate a correspondent for the other side between the two groups announced the cards, correspondent must confirm the A or B group of the cards after the results legal, in mandate to release the other group the cards.
rules of the game:
1, each of the parties choose their own leader, head of the organization by the vote, the statistics of how many red cards, the number of black cards, to the access the bulk correspondent reports the results of the voting group;
2, the group, by the time one abstained,
Lacoste R75 P2 Trainers, the vote is invalid, the validity of voting by the journalist to veto or confirm;
3, scoring rules are as usual:
If both sides of the black card, each have 3
If there is one for the red card, the other for the black card, black card is the negative side was 5 points, a red square is 5
If you get both a red card, of a negate 3 points
4, the game must be five votes, the second round score × 2, the fourth round score × 3, the ultimate outcome of the rule is: the highest win total is divided. (Some exercising courses enterprise, also has two group negotiation shackle, let the two groups to communicate, of course, negotiations often can not keep its agree.)
Course of the game:
host announced after the start of the game, team no communication between, but among the group can fully communicate in the meantime, the host will not reply any questions raised by participants in the game. Two groups were separated in two session apartments, everyone whack, there are few people volunteered to require that when the head immediately, and then issued their election manifesto, and finally, self-confidence is often very strong, eloquent, good people picked.
then began to vote, which is more chaotic process. Few of the rules of the game foggy, or even no interest; some immediate annotate, was asked selected red cards, it was suggested that selected black cards, at loggerheads. But in the end the voice is normally red prevailed, because their outlook is: both we undergo, or we win huge! While others have elected black huge risk: If the other side of the black, we have the opportunity to score, if the other gathering choose red, his big loss! More people are two-sided mail, if selected also red line, also choose the black line. The multitude began to have contentions, a different point of outlook want to convince each other, and some people playing a drowse, Landelikuai it all. Like a good blues!
then began a show of hands vote, voting statistics, the result is forever wrong, no verification of the original group members first, second, it was cited twice or hand, or do not raise their hands. Confusion, some people began to call for replacement of head, it was considered undemocratic, and intimidated to abstain from the process, particularly the dominant voice. Several times after the waiver, we believe that abstention is a waste of time, so unanimous: Do not waiver! Later, people who plan to abstain feel guilty, nor comes another shouted the. Because games usually begin at night, this time too often yet night-time.
soon, to a correspondent, reporting requirements, head of the voting results. This time, head on asset that do not explicit, speak haltingly, drawing boos. Correspondent said: I declare invalid the results of your group to vote! Correspondent left, the crowd immediately opened downtown, there is reflection on the problem, there are requirements for head, as well as investigation rules of the game, chaotic muddle.
If the head of the clear-headed, noisy enough, but also to retain the situation, or he can take the initiative to Yin had. If the case for head, muddle will be reiterated until there is a strong enough team leader there.
choose red voice gradually rising. Many-sided wag faction, began to tend to choose red. Choose black in upholding, but their voices pile up. Group results out: choose red! Finally acknowledged the vote to correspondent, when the results of the first round out of: A group of selected red, B group selected red. The two sides of a negative 3 points.
One interesting result is that if any group of men long, the first round of culling is the outcome of nearly one hundred percent red, and women headed, but occasionally may be chose black cards. Of course, if the correspondent hurl a few more women elected head of the little chance.
after several circulars of voting process is relatively smooth, the results can be fast out. I have experienced Sanci in the game, there are the results:
the first round of the second round (× 2) third round of the fourth round (× 3) the fifth round of
A Group B Group A Group B Group Group A Group B Group A Group B Group A Group B
red red red red the first black
red red red red second third black
red, black and red, black and red and black black black
their final score is:
first: A group of -2, B -22
second group: A group -10, B group - 20
third: A group of +32, B group -26
which ought be eminent that the third field of the Group B actuator is a quite lusty matron, she was insistent to convince you prefer black card, of course,
Lacoste Gravitate Trainers, team members because of her fixed paid the price to make 50 push-ups, and she made a 100.
I believe the game has gone through these three people who will not have the same sensibilities. For the first game, the fact in the third round of voting, the situation is very rewarding, I suggest that we should hurl the black card, so fool the antagonist, even if the other side of the red, we were less losses (because the second round of score to × 2, while the fourth round score to × 3), so in the third round, we must a red card, the other party has been misled, this one is most probable a black card, which is a score, with the effect of the final word!
In the second game, both team leader of the change is almost a farce,
Lacoste Trainers 2010, and finally, by the teachers ruthless rebuke: to see how many your total score! How much are you wasting resources, and finally it is a lose-lose!
dramatic third game, it seems that in the fourth round of Group B final touched the A group, they also began a black card, of course, this is the strong stance,
Lacoste Swerve Trainers, because they have the odds in hand.
a lot of people do this game through the night, done a lot of people rupture into tears after the game, what divine games, there is such a traumatic efficacy? This is just a game it, need it?
life is no a game? But the most momentous game of life feud is that we merely opportunity - of life for each of us have merely an chance. Game melodrama is not agreeable, we tin begin over, we tin even alteration the rules of the game, to obtain the results in our prefer, merely our life? We have no aptitude to alteration whichever rules, even approach the end of the game we will have occasion to understand the rules of the game and averaging, this is how sad and frustrating fact!
Let us recollect, the game gives us the reflection and inspiration:
a team of team leaders and human
co-optation voting process, it is a human focus on the process unfolds. We can penetrate that some people play, some people silent, some people disturbed. For any leader to waken
When correspondent negative group after the vote, often immediate stir within the group, then group leader if strong enough, he will lose the position, but if the team with too strong, he also led the team into the errors, the third game results illuminate this point.
experienced after the initial disordered state, there are three elementary human face apparently, let us near and look at their eyes, their inner world.
the first person to insist on a red card, they represent the depths of human ecology aggressive, attack, selfish and self-oriented. Their slogan is: either win the whole world, or completely lost, or with the competitor die! This is very typical gambler intellect. Or, this is the behavior of the wolf.
second, they are gentle and lenient, they hope to inflate the market together with opponents to achieve a win-win. They are logical, but more idealism: what they think their tolerance, harmony, and bounty, we will be capable to get the same answer to each other, how they know it have to be able to win? Their ideal is conditional, they need to live in suitable context. Or, this is the behavior of sheep.
third person, who is blind, confused, and they lack the wisdom to distinguish right from wrong, they do not even know what they should be out of cards, they are susceptible to induction, we can say that their mind is basically immature , or, is irresponsible, so they either go with the flow, or no position, or just give up.
Then, in the course of the game,
Lacoste Shua Lace Trainers, there is causative that is realistic, full of wisdom, that know how aggressive they know tolerance, indulgence, also know people who give a timely form? No. Because this is the cage game design, game designers equitable want to through this game, converge on people exposure to the secret, dingy matter, after all, everyone is not perfect, has its own blind smudges and mistakes, unfortunately, their do not know.
accordingly, focus on exposing human disability, it is the subtleties of game design.
Second, cooperation and communication, aggressive and give up, we are strong and the weak
when to attack, but when the tolerance? Some people in the opening of the game, like a digit of ways to communicate with other members of the team, and finally to reach a win-win situation, but in the end can not do so because: First, the group can not communicate between; the second is the incipient concert, it is easy havoc and change. In the beginning of voting, it was suggested that we should take the initiative to faith! Attracted everyone's to blame, honesty has a price! Indeed, a group once the injury presently after agreeable aggressive. This is not a microcosm of life, do we? Business once fooled, immediately no longer trust that anybody, including my own parents; be a cheat a man dressing cups, wearing glasses after the look, feel all of them are terrifying. Besides, we live in a world of asymmetric message, we want to communicate, but how much we really spent a mind to communicate? Once the meager communication, we will not give up easily, and we started to think the problem are rooted in each other, because the other side is so unreasonable, unreasonable and merciless.
It is said that the strong can give the other a black card, because he has the risk tolerance, so feeble it? The feeble can only wait for the opportunity (when the other side of the black card), or only a lose-lose? Another subtlety of the game design is to design a
in the game, people easily give up the In the team, occasionally we will not give up easily, because we have to think the collective interest. But we look at the outcome of the game rules: sub-total is the highest wins. In fact, if we adhere to abstain, at least we can be So it was that out, but also a kind of wisdom, as the Thirty-Six in the
really strong, we must have strong intelligence that They can lower the diagram, they are humble and gentle, their So strong, they are bad?
real world dominated by the strong, will give the weak machinery set out, and will protect such a mechanism. But the real weak, can not seize this opportunity? Know how to leave, often no longer the weak; and exit of people do not comprehend, is the real need of protection, but they often do not know, who can help got them?
Third, change and change, knowledge and liability, commitment and faith
I queried the man to lead the team to vanquish the team leader, is what forces you to the end? Why do you want spared no exertion to convince you choose the black card, even after we poll, you are able to withstand the Her faint smile: a responsibility.
is the responsibility! What a supremely dull and word language!
reflect above our team, how many times the gallantry to resist pressure, mallet to their principles, firmly to the goal and not change the target. Because we are also effortless to grant yourself to convert flexible, our cause is that the globe is changing, the only constant is change itself, so our goal can be adjusted to change the intention, strategies can be rebuilt. Our reason is that people in the amphitheatre, involuntarily ah.
some time, we insist, listen to any against and commentary, we believe that this is right, we are absolutely insistent to do it, the end result, possibly we succeed, maybe failure, how do we to reflect on it? Is it just to say to yourself: this is God, this is some kind of preparation, one-third of the personnel, seven destiny?
If so, do not we say these words, because everybody knows the absolute fact, talk out, and have really become rubbish. So, what is our guiding principle and not?
first responsibility. As a team leader, we must give up everything for this team. A mom, babies in distress when in the often amazing burst of strength, will salvage their kid, we are celebrating this magnificent motherhood in the meantime, think, this power comesintoseffect? Is it not responsibility?
In real life, how much to disburse for the team leader, comparable to the mother of the children to pay it? State-owned corporations is clearly impossible, because the mastery is designated by higher authorities, diverse the mother of to children, pregnant woman has experienced ache, experienced the anguish of childbirth once, unlike in the mother's children, as blood interlinked, Heart matched. Some of the leadership mobile call 24 hours a day, and some people think that this is a fastening, only a few people understand, this is responsibility.
followed along wisdom, is based on the wisdom of responsibility, or is based on the wisdom of the responsibility. At premier, we may not be smart, but the responsibility can aid us do that; premier, we are not strong enough, but also a responsibility to aid us do this. Wise direction of the responsibility to lest mistakes we made. Who in each other even after the two ruddy cards cling to the third round of cards is also a black brain, her sense of responsibility commendable, but her wisdom worked? After the cards in the 1st round, the results of their disadvantage, then they should reflect on strategy, and if the sheep's kindness to accommodate the wolf bombards the sheep really lost anything, but the wolf will be everything. I asked her, why do not you choose to abstain? She was dumb.
If we are willing to sacrifice for the team, then we should spare no effort to become a team leader or team play an important role, because it was their responsibility to do. Of course, our rank in the team, on the one hand depends on our sense of responsibility, and partial depends on our ability. However, if we become a team leader, does not mean we must make one repugnant or defensive tactics, we can too choose to give up, you can too give up the disregard, which is our right, ah, why should we give up easily this right?
then think of Zhuge Liang's 6 Ky Son. In the orthodox literati's idea, 6 Ky Son represents a liability, The face of ordinary and incompetent employer, if he truly responsible for the common people the world, why did he not replaced? The face of knowing that they are impossible to regain the Central Plains of the war, why he should insist on coming out, until slew in war? This may not have the wisdom and responsibility, but a question of faith. Faith can not be reproved. Team leader for the faith, he will still make faults, they would be dying, but we can not esteem.
four games with the Nash equilibrium of the universe's ultimate truth
fact, red and black game from Tucker (Tucker) 1950, intended a model of the noted game, This is a complete information static game of a typical case. (So-called complete information game is the game the other parties are fully conscious of the game side in all cases the loss or gain, but also know what they are in all cases of wastage or acquire.)
Basic speculations Prisoner's Dilemma consist in ...: The police seized two partners criminals, but the absence of ample testify against their crimes. As long as there is a conceded culprit, will be able to confirm the charges. To get the confession, the police these two criminals were retarded to discourage them manner a conspiracy of muffle. If they either alleged not guilty, then they will be sentenced to inferior charges of one annual in prison; if they have one person confessed to their offenses, the honest, immediate release, without the guilty pleas will be sentenced to 8 years; whether they both admitted to their offenses, they will be sentenced to 5 years in jail each. They can not collude in
and fully rational, below the premise that everyone must pursue their own interests and not concern to maximize the interests of his accomplices, and the other two sides will not believe the morale of cooperation, the final result, not only achieve their desired results (each sentenced to five years) that they could not run the The ending is also known as
This article does not in-depth discussion of game methodology and Nash balance, because too many factors that determine the results of a game: both sides know the information is complete (one half of the game a lot of people, it is illegible rules); can communicate (one for each group members will detect ways to attempt to discover each other's information); the agreement are being complied with (if anyone violated an agreement, he is the best interests of earnings earners); both sides are rational (think approximately who insist on a black card group long bar), and so on. In many games, I was startled to ascertain that the real
Why? This is a trap game,
Womens Lacoste Arin Trainers, or the life of the trap?
the basic laws of thermodynamics tells us: We can nor establish neither demolish vigor. The vigor of the macrocosm is a nailed amount of the beginning and never changed, though energy can neither be created nor be destroyed, but it can be converted from one form to another form, this is the first law of thermodynamics. That being the case, we are not in any way the consumption of natural energy? Second law of thermodynamics, when energy is transformed from one state to different state, we will The penalty is that we lost in the hereafter to do some kind of power for a definite energy. This is called entropy. Entropy is a element of energy, but it can no longer be transformed into deeding, that is, it has no use. In other words, the world we live day by day look no different, even more pretty, but it is unavoidable one day toward the die. When the silence to an end, re-big bang macrocosm, all overagain. This is alike to Buddhism, said: into, to live, bad air, and this is the truth of the universe. Contemporary science and antique wisdom, was actually surprisingly alike!
once accomplished the ultimate truth of the universe, 1:01 to lose and win, what is the point?
need to unravel things, basically there will be no victors in red and black game. No one in this game will feel a real win, everyone in the reflection, for his life blind spots and errors, as the depths of human desire for the human form of society.
Finally, think of Mr. Li met with the mainland in April this year when visiting entrepreneurs, to the four questions, then study time, as the article's end:
1, while we nightmare of greater success, We have not more hard apt prepare?
2, when our dreams become a leader, we have at the service of humility?
3, we often only want to change others, we know when to change yourself?
4, every day when we criticize others, we know how to do self-reflection?
original author: Ren Zhengping
-------------------- ----------------------
This article is procreated from: the wind in the valley: the game of puzzle and mysterious signification red and black
perusing space with QQ Email Subscribe ravine of the wind
what is the reading room?